My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01912
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 4:49:18 PM
Creation date
2/20/2024 4:37:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1912
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DeBenedet <br />residents. <br />community <br />residents. <br />ROSEVILLE pJAWING COMMISSION <br />Page# 6 <br />Wednesday, January 4, 1989 <br />asked if the existing user fee structure favors <br />Bierschied answered that people working in the <br />but not living in the community are also considered <br />DeBenedet pointed out that <br />40,000 jobs in Roseville in <br />than residents. This would <br />that ld <br />there is a strong <br />' ied that the initial acquisition has beingeen done <br />put ion <br />Berry testified <br />paid for and that there s c rr@nt Se ntensesuexercise fitness <br />facilities because of the increases, job <br />movement. Berry stated that with population chools, it would be <br />increases and declining <br />access to srequirements at <br />appropriate to consider increased dedication <br />this time. <br />• 1ed that the requirements should includieu go'duland <br />Berry testified <br />and money <br />scale for different land uses n <br />provisions. <br />Johnson stated that the Twin bakes area is a great example of <br />where there <br />would be an increased need in a commercial industrial <br />area to provide trails and other facilities. <br />projections show that <br />wthere <br />morewould <br />jobs <br />be <br />the future which would <br />place more pressure on ark systemsysand <br />to improve the Cityls p <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br />Stokes stated that changes are necessary improve <br />to maintain and . <br />the park system. Stokes testified that the ordinance requirement <br />should be a staggered system based on land use. <br />tt t <br />Goedeke commented that historically <br />into development of parks, only into <br />that more money is needed other from <br />not enough money has been p <br />acquisition. Goedeke stated <br />the general taxpayer. <br />oeller asked that the ordinance apply to lot splits <br />M <br />all plats and <br />City's option, <br />and whether is <br />DeBenedet pc_nted out that <br />lot splits, should h in elook <br />u Of <br />and that staff <br />should be pre -platted value <br />P�annin File 1915 <br />staff should consider <br />land provisions at the <br />at the issue of value <br />or after plat v"1' <br />Scott Nelson request for a lot division <br />County Road B. <br />as well. <br />at 1027 and 1035 W• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.