My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01910
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 8:37:32 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 8:37:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1910
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Depa mrt eft A <br />Item Descrip <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />al: <br />Manager Reviewed: <br />DATE: 10 -2.4 - 8 8 <br />ITEM NO.: E b <br />Kg ne da Section: <br />Report and Recommendations <br />John Jaeger request for a minor variance at <br />on: Road B2. <br />996 County <br />1988 and <br />considered <br />The Minor Variance Committee msor°�ar4ancerto9allow expansioned a 21 <br />of the <br />T request for a min Jaeger has add <br />John Jaeger s req at 996 County Road 8--2, i�1i�. <br />existing dwelling <br />2q foot addition onto the front r°Qfuixementthe sofn30 <br />foot six inch by and Setback q <br />house which does not dwellingehasaa rear yard setback of G feet. <br />feet. The existing Jaeger to <br />anted a variance in ig77 which. �lwith dthe �condLion that <br />The City granted garage ford of the boos home and <br />construct a new rwaed on the site, that the olderas cancerned <br />once a new homes constructt consistent with the <br />will b® removed, The minor variance committee w <br />garage nest was no <br />that the current variance r®q approval of this <br />and whether or net the committee had the <br />aforementioned conditionrecommending pp have <br />power to contradict that condition by has not <br />The applicant stated that his intentions may <br />variance request. request because he <br />been misrepresented in the previous req however, that if he were <br />intended to build a new homed He build�itdin compliance with City <br />to build a new house, he weal <br />requirements. <br />rc�cor�mand that the miner <br />The Minor Variance committee unanimously urated . The commi ttco further r�c � �mth�s that <br />variance reqest be gra <br />the council <br />review the prev <br />xc�us variance and c�cterm n <br />variance is appropriate, <br />All impacted neighbors labors sttpport06 tale project. <br />Requirement: <br />Proposed: <br />Variance: <br />% Variance' <br />COUNCIL, ACTION <br />30 feot <br />5 feet <br />25 feet <br />83 <br />REQUESTED: <br />Motion to approve/deny <br />John jacgor's <br />request for a minor variance at 996 <br />County Road B2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.