pf_01887 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

, , r r PLANNING REPORT DATE: 5 October 1988 CASE NUMBER: 1887 APPLICANT: Dove Development LOCATION: North of County Road B, West of Victoria Street (see sketch) ACTION REQUESTED: Planned Unit Development, Preliminary and Final Plat, Variance to PUD Minimum Size PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Mr. Marvin Tramm of Dove Development has spent a considerable amount of time this past year attempting to develop the property in question. The initial parcel is part of the Nellie Bufton Estate and consists of a rectangular piece of property with 134.73 feet of frontage on County Road B. Added to the tract was a tax forfeit piece in the far northwest corner of the proposed development site. In addition there is a lot consisting of 80.87 feet of frontage on Victoria Street owned by Sheila Olson. Altogeti these parcels measure 71,772 square feet. Six lots are proposed, two of which have existing houses on the. sites. The average lot in the PUD is 11,962 square feet which exceeds the 11,000 square foot R-1 minimum lot size. 2. Mr. Tramm has proposed various methods of developing the land, the first of which was a public street constructed where a private cul-de-sac is proposed to be built. He attempted to interest neighbors to the east in dividing their land to create a series of lots along the east side of this proposed cul-de-sac. Not all of the neighbors wished to do this, therefore, the construction of a public cul-de-sac was abandoned. 3. The current proposal is. a Planned Unit Development for single-family housing. It is most similar to the development proposed and approved by the City for Jim Casey on an area further south on Victoria. 4. Under a Planned Unit Development, a private roadway can be constructed and owned jointly by the properties served. These owners vdill be members of an association to maintain the private street. This technique is common in multi -family development and is being used more and more for single-family and duplex development. 5. Mr. Tramm has submitted larger scale drawings of the homes he anticipates building on the sites. These drawings were not reduced in scale, therefore, they will not be included in this report, but they will be available at the hearing. 6. Attached is a letter from Mr. Tramm, as well as a reduced copy of the development plan that did not reproduce well. In order to read the plan more effectively, we have copied the text portion of the plan at a