My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01874
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01874
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 10:05:28 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 10:03:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1874
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Friday August 19, 1988 <br />Page# 4 <br />DeBenedet pointed out that other facilities in the area have B6 <br />12 curb and that it would be a small part of the total cost to <br />bring the curbing up to code. <br />Keel summarized the drainage issues and stated that catch basins <br />may be required as well as a permit from the Rice Creek Water <br />Management Board. <br />DeBenedet questioned whether ponding would be necessary on this <br />site if the adjacent pond serves the area. Keel responded that <br />a drainage plan is necessary to determine how the drainage will <br />be handled. <br />Moeller pointed out that the parking lot would have to be torn up <br />to provide a catch basin in the area. <br />Johnson asked what engineering would see prior to the City <br />Council. Keel responded that they would need rough concept plans <br />with final details being submitted before staff approval. <br />Grant expressed his concern about providing catch baE , because <br />they are a high expense item. Keel outlined where c,- -ch basins <br />could be provided with a minimized expense. <br />Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded to recommend approval of <br />variances to the city floor area ratio and curbing requirements <br />with the following conditions: <br />1. That the drainage plan be submitted for city and staff <br />approval. <br />2. That sidewalk be constructed or funds escrowed for future <br />sidewalk construction along Long Lake Road. <br />3. That a landscape plan be submitted for staff approval which <br />provides for additional landscaping along the south and west <br />sides of the site. <br />4. That the bituminous parking area be repaired. <br />5. That concrete perimeter curbing be constructed around the <br />bituminous parking area. <br />Maschka indicated a concern that curbing of the back lot would be <br />unreasonable. Moeller stated that curbing around the parking <br />area does not seem to serve a purpose, and that the city would <br />not be gaining anything by that requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.