My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01874
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01874
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 10:05:28 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 10:03:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1874
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page# 3 <br />Wednesday, January 4, 1989 <br />Dahlgren testified that outside storage is typically related to <br />the convenience store aspect and not necessarily related to the <br />gasoline sales. Dahlgren asked where the cut off should be and <br />whether a City would want supermarkets to have outside storage. <br />Goedeke pointed out that the City's such as Edina required a set <br />back from property lines and stated the City should include a <br />side yard setback requirement in the new ordinance. <br />Dahlgren commented that some Cities prohibited outside display <br />and merchandising in any required yard. <br />DeBenedet stated his opinion that the intent in this case is <br />taking existing uses and recognizing reasonable practices but <br />that the City shouldn't open it up completely to allow any use to <br />have outside merchandising and display. <br />DeBenedet testified that other uses such as Byerly's display and <br />merchandise salt and that the equipment rental operation on Rice <br />and County Road C also has exterior display which the City should <br />consider. DeBenedet added that the provisions in the new <br />ordinance relating to sidewalk sales are ambiguous and should be <br />cleaned up to allow sidewalk sales only B days a year per <br />building or site. <br />Berry stated that she had observed a problem with sidewalk sales <br />over a long period of time at a clothing store. <br />Kuhr stated that the equipment provision related to the <br />situation at a hardware store at Roselawn and Lexington which was <br />required to remove a storage building that they were selling <br />which was displayed away from the building. Kehr added that this <br />should be allowed if there is room on the site to properly <br />display the aiece of equipment. <br />Bud Kolp from Super America stated he was not aware of these <br />discussions at previous meetings. Kolp added that Super American <br />could live with the regulation except the sidewalk sale <br />limitations because they typically run 10 daffy oil and p®psi, <br />sales. Kolp pointed out that the outside storage is necessary as <br />a convenience to their customers and typically involves heavy <br />bulky items which are difficult for people to get in the store <br />and ca.-.-y out a., �►.��� vehiclas. <br />. .4A 4 IL i 4 4 V' 4. l <br />Dave Johnson from Suburban ftnrdwaro stated that the regulations <br />were OK except that the five percent limitation was too small and <br />that 10 percent ;could be better. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.