My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01874
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01874
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 10:05:28 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 10:03:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1874
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Roseville, Outside Merchandising Page 2 <br />fence not less than 5 feet high, except for establishments of <br />drive-in type offering goods or services directly to- customers and <br />off-street parking and loading." <br />The reference to drive-in (as written in 1958) was, at that time, <br />intended for the offering of food and beverages on a tray attached to a <br />car window. Now, some 30 years later, the accelerated use of the <br />automobile as a sales vehicle including drive-in and drive-thru facilities <br />makes that definition more ambiguous thar, when -it was originally <br />written. This is the key paragraph in the Ordinance relating to exterior <br />sales and should be amended to be more explicit whatever ultimate` <br />policy decision is decided upon. <br />3. Practically all of the communities for which we prepared ordinances <br />back in the 50s and 60s, starting with St. Louis Park, Bloomington, and <br />Roseville included the prohibition of the display and sale of merchandise <br />outside of a store. We have not conducted any current research <br />regarding the status of these regulations in the Metropolitan Area <br />communities today. However, that can be done should the Planning <br />Commission and Councildesire to do so: <br />4. It would seem appropriate that our first objective should be to decide <br />to what extent exterior display and/or sales are reasonable and under <br />what conditions. Additional information as to the options may be. <br />desirable. Once the policy objectives are determined, appropriate <br />language can be prepared to carry out those objectives. <br />5. Attached is a letter from the City Attorney's office outlining their <br />perspective ralating to the Ordinance as it exists. The setting of a <br />more definitive policy and the enactment of more explicit; language <br />appears to be the best approach to a reasonable and enforceable <br />solution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.