pf_01874 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION' Page# 7 Wednesday, March 1, 1989 Berry moved and Goedeke seconded to recommend approval of an ordinance to allow outside merchandising and display as a use by special use permit in the B-2 and B-3 districts using the criteria listed in the staff report. Roll Call: Ayes: Nays: Planning File 1912 DeBenedet, Berry, Moeller, Johnson None Subdivision Ordinance Amendment concerning requirements. Presentation Goedeke, Stokes, land dedication Dahlgren summarized the reasons for the proposed ordinance change and the proposed land dedication requirements for various land uses. Stokes stated that he liked the ordinance but would like to see the per unit fees reversed for multi family and single family so that multi family pays more than single family. Stokes added that this would encourage single family development instead of multi family development. Dahlgren replied that the ordinance makes sense the way it is set up because if you add up the fees that a typical project would have to pay, there would be a heavy load on multi -family apartments. DeBenedet testified that the decision whether cash or land is required, should be a City recision. Dahlgren answered that the enabling legislation clearly makes that decision a City decision. Berry stated that it was appropriate for the Council to reestablish fees to keep figures up to date. George Reiling pointed out that the Council in the past, when they passed the original bond issue, stated that there would be no need for 10% dedication requirement. Reiling stated that there was a moral issue here and a promise made by the Council. Reiling said that if The 10% dedication is passed, the -City would be a hypocrite. Reiling stated that the ordinance change should not be passed and that there were other ways to raise the necessary funds. Johnson closed the public hearing.