My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01857
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01857
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 10:24:18 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 10:22:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1857
Planning Files - Type
Division of Land
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gerald H. Kaufhold, Case No. 1857 Page <br />that long range solutions for the property in question be proposed and <br />hopefully will be compatible with the neighborhood interests, the wider <br />community interests, and workable for the developer and owner. <br />b. In the mean time, the Council has requested that the Community <br />Development Director make contact with other developers who may be <br />interested in utilizing the site. Mr. Craig Waldron, Community <br />Development Director, has pursued this objective and has a major <br />developer interested in considering the site. Mr. Waldron informs us <br />that he antiticipates receiving the outlines of the development proposal <br />by the end of May. Mr. Kaufhold 'has noted his agreement to sell the <br />property at a price reviewed with Mr. Waldron. The objective of such <br />a proposal would be to develop the land for multi -family housing <br />purposes and would include the retention of a major portion of the site <br />for park purposes. It would seem reasonably important to allow <br />sufficient time in order to consider a potenLial solution under such a <br />concept. <br />7. In summary, though the proposed action requested is simply a platting <br />_ of the land without rezoning of the property, the implication of that <br />plat will have far reaching and permanent impact on the two major <br />questions remaining, i.e., a long range and permanent park decision and <br />the ultimate use of the properties now temporarily occupied by the <br />school. It would seem inadvisable to proceed with decisions on portions <br />of the land and likely be a mistake on the remainder. Obviously, we <br />should avoid for the sake of all parties the possibility of "making a <br />mistake on purpose". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.