Laserfiche WebLink
02 :\n, jilt 2d <br />to prescribc: the <br />to determine the <br />,111, and training; <br />:x:el paper, cards, <br />fees; to provide <br />services; and to <br />tl Scrvicc and to <br />: is authorized to: <br />)rmance of official <br />and employees in <br />discharge, or take <br />:s; rclicyc officers <br />r other legitimate <br />. to it; dct-rminc <br />ns arc to be con- <br />arriers and other <br />ieccssary to carry <br />)men(, promotion, <br />it and reasonable <br />,ges in rates, fees, <br />iervice is enjoined <br />)r granting undue <br />ling classifications, <br />organization Act,' <br />:rvicc may not be <br />a change in the <br />on a nationwide <br />:ithin a reasonable <br />tal Rate Commis - <br />Commission shall <br />or hearing on the <br />the mail, and an <br />:sent the interests <br />lly vested in the <br />the Board may <br />he public by any <br />id: c=cs of postal <br />I,•ttt, t, ' I he .11 .`)cI\I( C i. until;ugly prohibited Irt.ln tlikult;ute: the <br />.tddre"�,if precut, of ,Ins Ix,.t;tl pallun; ntfurnuttion of <br />ontl,tCrci;11 n;lt,llc, ink ludin� IrAdc ,ct rc•I,,, I.hclhc► ur nut ut;lained (rota <br />.t pcl.uu outside the I'o>I.,I tier i, c, k.•hit h un(lcr good husifIrss I)r;retire• wOI l <br />nut Irc publicly disc loscd; infontuktion prepared for use in connection with <br />pos1;11 r;Ile (lroc ccding;s; rc ports ,,nil mc•nu,randa of consultants ur indt•pencleul <br />conlractors except to the cxtcllt dElt they would be required to be disclosed <br />if prepared within the Postal Service; investigatory files, wl►ethcr or not <br />considered closed, conkpilcd for late enforcement purposes except to the extent <br />available by law to a party other than the Postal Service; and information <br />prepared for use in connection with the negotiation of collective bar.gaining <br />agreements with postal ernployecs.° <br />§ 7. Primacy of the Postal Service vis-a-vis state and local regulation. <br />So far as the supersession of state laws is concerned, the same principles <br />apply when the postal powers of Congress arc exercised, as in the case of the <br />exercise of its power over interstate commerce.10 Arcordingdv, reg►dations <br />enacted by the states or state agencies are invalid and innperatWe insofar as <br />they interfere or conflict with federal control." The primacy of the Postal <br />Service does not, however, preclude the states, municipalities, or other local <br />governmental agencies from the enactment and enforcement of laws or regu- <br />lations which affect the postal service only incidentally, in the absence of <br />pre-emptive federal laws or regulations governing the sub1crt." Thus a <br />former federal statute which provided that nten)llership in any organization <br />Of postal employees not affiliated with any outside organization imposing an <br />obligation upon them to participate in any strike against the United States <br />should not constitute cause for reduction in rank or compensation, or removal <br />from service, did not indicate an intent on the part of Congress to occupy <br />completely the field of regulation of organizations of federal postal employers, <br />so as to invalidate a state law which prohibited its labor organizations, includ- <br />ing those whose members were federal postal clerks, from discriminating, by <br />reason of race, color, or creed, in the admission or treatment r,f nu•nrber. " <br />And the power of Congress to establish post offices and post ru;tcls is not <br />infringed by a state statute uncicr which I railway Imstal clerk, injurt•d in <br />B. :19 USC ; 412. <br />9. 19 USC ., 410(c). <br />10- Crodry v Weil, 382 III 338, 48 NE2d <br />:IH6, 14.5 ALR 1244. <br />11. Pennsylvania R. Co. v Public Service <br />Cum. 250 US 366, 63 L Ed 1142, 40 S Ct 36. <br />Regulations of the Interstate Commerce <br />Commission prescribing requisites for ca• <br />boosc cars without platforms, and of the Post <br />Office Department respecting like equipment <br />of mail cars when used as end cars, amount <br />to such an assumption of control by the <br />United States over tilt subject matter as to <br />invalidate a state statute insofar as it requires <br />that a mail car, when used as the last car in <br />an interstate train, be equipped at its rear end <br />with a platform 30 inches in width, and with <br />guardrails and steps. Pennsylvania R. Co. <br />v Public Service Com., supra. <br />12. Martin v Pittsburg & L. E. R. Co. <br />-'(•I US 281. 11 1. Ed 181, 27 S Ct 100 <br />f limitation of liability of milmad for injury <br />to railway mail clrrk). <br />A.. to the necc..ity for a postal enkpluyce <br />It, secure a stair driver's license, sec 7 Am <br />Jur 2d, At.T01-10911.F.S AND I{IrIlWAY TRAF- <br />FIC Q 102. <br />As to liability of carriers for violation of <br />state hiRhway regulations, see 7 Am Jur 2d, <br />AUT01,10aILFS AND HIGHWAY TRAFF 6 171. <br />13, Railway Mail Asso. v Corsi, 321, 'S 88, <br />89 L Ed 2072, 65 S Ct 1483 (holy-ig that <br />the provisions of the New York Civil Rights <br />Law which prohibit any labor or)tanization <br />from discriminating, by reason of race, color, <br />or creed, in the admission or treatment of <br />Inelnters, are not, as applied to an organiza- <br />tion of are <br />clerks of the United States <br />Railway Mail service, in conflict with the <br />federal power over post offices and post roads <br />as circumscribed in article 1, section 8, clause <br />7, of the Federal Constitution). <br />9 <br />