Laserfiche WebLink
Gerald Kaufhold, Case No. 1787 <br />Page 4 - <br />13. The rezoning to B-3 and B-1 is as indicated on the preliminary plat <br />drawing dated July 1, 1987 as submitted. The rezoning proposal, of <br />course, is consistent with the parcels as proposed in the Comprehensive <br />Plan amendment and as indicated on the preliminary plat drawing. <br />14. The architect has submitted a full size drawing of the landscape plan, <br />which is attached, because the reduced copy is difficult to read. <br />15. The development proposal for the reuse of the Lexington School site is <br />important to the residents in the neighborhood and the City as a whole. <br />It would appear to be a good idea to take our time and seriously <br />negotiate with the applicant toward an acceptable solution. Perhaps, a <br />matter of importance will not be resolved at a single public hearing. <br />Any solution will evolve impact on the neighborhood, the park system, <br />tax base, and the overall community interest. We have a successful <br />local entrepreneur working with a capable designer toward a solution <br />within the framework of the proposal acceptable ' by the School Board. <br />Thus, the ingredients appear to be workable as a basis for negotiations. <br />