My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01787
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 12:15:36 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 12:07:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1787
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 11/09/87 <br />ITEM NO.: /-�) -I <br />roval: Mana er Reviewed: <br />Agenda Section: <br />Hearings <br />Item Description: Gerald Kaufhold request for rezonin <br />Plan Amendment, preliminar g, Comprehensive <br />1130 County Road B. <br />y plat► and variance at <br />The Roseville Planning Commission, at its September 2 1987 <br />unanimously recommended denial of the Gerald Kaufhold►re request <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment q t for <br />County Road B. This was based ponlthe nfollowinary g and variance at :1130 <br />g findings of fact: <br />1• That the size and intensity of the rezoning request <br />consistent with the Lexington area is not <br />the proposed B-3 use. ► Particularly as it relates to <br />2. That the proposal conflict <br />h the Cit <br />commercial strip development wonLexington.policy to discourage <br />3• That the City has sought to ' <br />it is currently in place, protect and preserve R-1 zoning where <br />4. That the adjacent areas to the south are zoned R-1, <br />5, That the planned amendment and rezoning are inconsistent <br />current land used in the area. tent with the <br />6. That the rezoning is inconsistent with the Comprehensive <br />The developer has twice asked for continuations Plan. <br />October meetings, which were from the September and <br />rthethe Council determined that the ahearingAwould betcond Council meeting, <br />November 9, 1987 meeting, ucted at the <br />The developer will be presenting athe proposal that was considered byplan g the Planning that is somewhat modified from <br />zoning request is a B-2 rather than a B-3, the park sCommission in that the <br />and the facility to the southeast has been downsizedltos singl expanded, <br />A copy of the new proposal is included in your packet for single story. <br />r your review. . <br />0. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: <br />Motion approving/denying Gerald Kaufhold's request for <br />pensive Plan Amendment, preliminary plat, and variance rezoning, oty <br />Road B. e at 1130Countyu, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.