My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01787
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 12:15:36 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 12:07:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1787
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M E M O R A N D U M <br />TO: Jim Andre <br />FROM: Craig A. Waldron <br />RE: Potential Findings of Fact Relating to the Post st Office <br />Attached is an RCA from the 11-9-87 findings as depicted in this memo, would still appear City Council meeting, The <br />relevant findings, should the council to to deny to be <br />Office project. The findings were depicted as follows. <br />he post <br />1• Size and intensity of the zoning request <br />1 <br />consistent with the Lexington area particularly as not <br />relates to the proposed use, <br />choosing to deny, may want to modify(The this to cil, if <br />state business zoning) . _ 7,',��sa simply <br />l�US� ties ZT�v��'� <br />2. The proposal conflicts with city <br />commercial strip development on LxPolicy <br />i gt n.tO discourage <br />3. The cityrhas sought tzoning, <br />protect and preserve R-1 a�5 currently in place, oiling, <br />where <br />4. The adjacent areas to the south are zoned R-1, <br />5. The planned amendment and rezoning are inconsis <br />with the current land use in the area. tent <br />6. The rezoning is inconsistent with the comprehensive <br />plan. P nsive <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.