My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01787
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 12:15:36 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 12:07:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1787
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M E M O R A N D U M <br />DATE: September 1, 1988 <br />TO: Jim Andre <br />FROM: Craig A. Waldron <br />SUBJECT: Status of Lexington JSool Project. <br />Jerry Kaufhold and Tom Dunwell were in to meet with Rick and <br />myself (August 31) to formally submit the modified proposal for <br />the Lexington School site. The approval of the modified <br />proposal, which is essentially the same project that was <br />discussed at the August 29th work session, is contingent upon the <br />approval of a proposed agreement between Kaufhold and the City. <br />It is my understanding the proposed agreement as developed by the <br />mayor and Kaufhold is as follows: <br />1. Kaufhold agrees to dedicate 1 acre to the city. <br />2. The School District agrees to dedicate an additional acre <br />to the city, in return the city agrees to fund a police <br />school liaison officer (originally, pursuant to the <br />direction at the Council/Staff breakfast meeting, you and I <br />had approached Worner regarding a voluntary dedication of <br />two acres in addition to ,he 1 acre that would be provided <br />by Kaufhold). <br />3. The city would agree to consider tax increment financing for <br />the three acre housing development. Tax increment would not <br />be considered for housing during the first two years that <br />Mr. Kaufhold owns the project, nor after 10 years of <br />ownership. It is unclear if there is Council understanding <br />or consensus on this provision. <br />4. The city agrees to purchase an additional acre of park <br />predicated on the fact that the city and Kaufhold could <br />reach agreement on the price and that the payments would be <br />made on an installment basis. <br />It would be my recommendation that in order to properly proceed, <br />we should discuss this proposed agreement with the city council <br />to ensure concurrence with this particular approach. Based on <br />our discussion, I will be securing an appraisal on the land to be <br />acquired for park purposes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.