My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01787
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 12:15:36 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 12:07:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1787
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />r <br />Department Approval: <br />V , <br />Mangier Reviewed: <br />DATE: 11/09/87 <br />ITEM NO.: 9 -/ <br />Agenda Section: <br />Hearings <br />Item Description: Gerald Kaufhold request for rezoning, Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment, Preliminaryve <br />1130 County Road B. plat, and variance at <br />The Roseville Planning Commission, at its September 2, 1987 meeting, <br />unanimously recommended denial of the Gerald Kaufhold request for <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />preliminary <br />County Road B, This was basedonthes <br />following findinga f at 1130 <br />of fact: <br />1. That the size and intensity of the rezoning request is not <br />consistent with the Lexington area, particularly as it relates to <br />the Proposed B-3 use, <br />2. That the proposal conflicts with the City <br />commercial strip development on Lexington policy to discourage <br />3. That the City has sought to protect and preserve R-1 zonin w <br />it is currently in place, g here <br />4. That the adjacent areas to the south are zones R-1. <br />5• That the planned amendment and rezoning are inconsistent wit <br />current land used in the area. h the <br />6. That the rezoning is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Pla. 1. <br />The developer has twice asked for continuations, from the September <br />October meetings, which were granted. At the October Council meetins and <br />the Council determined that the hearing would be conducted at the g, <br />November 9, 1987 meeting, <br />The developer will be presenting a plan that is somewhat modified <br />from <br />the proposal that was considered by the Planning Commission in that th <br />zoning request is a B-2 rather than a B-3, the t the <br />and the facility to the southeast has been downsizedltosaxsingleghtly estory. <br />A copy of the new proposal is included in your g review. <br />packet for your review, <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: <br />Motion approving/denying Gerald Kaufhold's request for rezoning,Compre- <br />hensive Plan Amendment, preliminary plat, and variance at 1130 <br />County <br />Road B . my <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.