pf_01760 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

0 PLANNING REPORT ` DATE: 3 June 1987 CASE NUMBER: 1760 APPLICANT: CON/SPEC Corporation LOCATION: Southwest Corner of County Road D and Trunk Highway 88 (see sketch) ACTION REQUESTED: . Approval of Side Yard ariance PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1• Attached is a letter from Paul Holmes, Project Manager for CON/SPEC Corporation, dated May 1, 1987, in develop a two story, 10,000 Appraisal Research which he describes the proposal ,to square foot office building occs,.-,ied Associates, in Roseville". Appraisal Research by Ltd. presently located on Hamline Avenue Associates are real estate appraisers and CON/SPEC is building the building for them on the proposed site. 2. The proposal is to construct a the site. Attached are reduced 91984 square foot, two story building on the proposed structure. copies of a site plan and elevations of 3. The easterly boundary of the site is angled of Trunk Highway 88. 9 parallel with the direction 9 Y The corner of the structure along this parallel line will be slightly less than the 30 foot setback requirement contiguous to a public right-of-way. In this case, of course, the public right-of-way is contiguous to a Tr -ink Highway where the distance from the right-of-way line to the nearest pavement is approximately 75 feet. 4. The ; distance from the corner of the structure to this portion of the right-of-way is 22 feet. Thus, a varia. ze of 8 feet is requested. It would appear that this slight variance will have an undetectable impact on the development of the property. The remainder of the buildin the east side) is 31 feet from the right-of-way. 9 ion 5. The applicants note that 11700 square feet of the building will be for office storage purposes in which case the required structure would total 42 spaces, at 5 spaces q Parking for the pss office and 1 space per 2,000 for the storagearea.,total for of t43 spaces is provided in the site plan. d• The engineers have noted that the plans indicate the draining of the storm water from the parking area directly on to the State public right-of-way. It is true that in this location there is a pond on the right-of-way. The right of the developers, in this case, of moving the water to the pond will be subject to their negotiations with MnDOT.