My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-01-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2024
>
2024-01-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 2:47:13 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 2:46:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/23/2024
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
part of the petition process but would be a part of the notification, including <br />businesses. <br />Motion <br />Member Hodder moved, Member Luongo seconded, to recommend the City <br />Council accept the amended changes and approve the proposed Street Name <br />Change Policy. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />6. Public Works Code Updates <br />Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer explained City staff has been reviewing <br />ordinances and has a variety of public works related updates. He asked for <br />discussion and feedback to give to the City Council. <br />Bench Ordinance 703.05 <br />Mr. Freihammer reviewed the Bench Ordinance with the Commission. <br />Member Fergus indicated he was appreciative of the addition of this adjacent to <br />City pathways. <br />Chair Ficek noted there is a section P in there, relocation of license or permit and <br />he wondered if there was intended to be text behind that one. <br />Mr. Freihammer thought that was one section that the City Attorney was going to <br />add some language to. <br />Chair Ficek indicated he also liked the addition for the removal if it expires and not <br />actively being renewed the City can go in and remove it. <br />Member Luongo thought they were also waiting on some language for ADA <br />compliance because there is a Section J but there was not any wording in that <br />section. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained the City will clarify some language on that. <br />Member Rudolf indicated she had a question about Section K versus Section M. <br />The last sentence of Section K says, "Signage shall be affixed only to the street - <br />side portion of the bench backrest' and in Section M it says, "Advertising may be <br />displayed on the front and rear faces of the backrest." <br />Mr. Freihammer indicated that was a good catch. Staff added Section M to clarify, <br />and he thought Section M clearly conflicts with Section K. He thought staff could <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.