My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-01-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2024
>
2024-01-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 2:47:13 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 2:46:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/23/2024
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Ficek thought the City should be looking at the intersections and curves. To <br />him that is a safety issue. The mid -block light should not be automatic and should <br />be a request for people, he thought this should be a darker sky. He wondered if <br />people could request lighting can people also request to remove mid -block lighting <br />and make it darker. Should that be in there. Another thought he had is there should <br />be a difference between commercial and residential. He wondered what happens to <br />streets that have residential on one side and commercial on the other. <br />Mr. Freihammer indicated the City does not have much of that but could try to add <br />language to clarify that. <br />Chair Ficek thought regarding the midblock petition, the one hundred fifty feet <br />within the light is a high burden and one person could crash that. He wondered if it <br />should be more two-thirds or three quarters. He thought the one hundred percent <br />would be hard to get any group to agree to. <br />Mr. Freihammer noted the City staff works with Xcel as much as possible to put <br />the lighting where it would benefit everyone. <br />Member Hodder thought it made sense to see what the need would be or just to <br />assess what the City is missing. He thought that would be a good first step. <br />Mr. Freihammer appreciated the Commission feedback and will help staff draft <br />something to present to the City Council. <br />8. Future Agenda Items <br />Discussion ensued regarding the February 20, 2024 PWETC agenda: <br />• Sustainability Super Meeting <br />• Mowing Ordinance Discussion <br />• Pollinator Update/Issues <br />Mr. Freihammer also reviewed possible topics for the March and April meetings. <br />9. Adjourn <br />Motion <br />Member Hodder moved, Member Fergus seconded, adjournment of the <br />meeting at approximately 8:42 p.m. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.