My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024_0220_PWETC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2024
>
2024_0220_PWETC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 2:50:38 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 2:49:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/20/2024
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
115 part of the petition process but would be a part of the notification, including <br />116 businesses. <br />117 <br />118 Motion <br />119 Member Hodder moved, Member Luongo seconded, to recommend the City <br />120 Council accept the amended changes and approve the proposed Street Name <br />121 Change Policy. <br />122 <br />123 Ayes:7 <br />124 Nays:0 <br />125 Motion carried. <br />126 <br />127 6. Public Works Code Updates <br />128 Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer explained City staff has been reviewing <br />129 ordinances and has a variety of public works related updates. He asked for <br />130 discussion and feedback to give to the City Council. <br />131 <br />132 Bench Ordinance 703.05 <br />133 Mr. Freihammer reviewed the Bench Ordinance with the Commission. <br />134 <br />135 Member Fergus indicated he was appreciative of the addition of this adjacent to <br />136 City pathways. <br />137 <br />138 Chair Ficek noted there is a section P in there, relocation of license or permit and <br />139 he wondered if there was intended to be text behind that one. <br />140 <br />141 Mr. Freihammer thought that was one section that the City Attorney was going to <br />142 add some language to. <br />143 <br />144 Chair Ficek indicated he also liked the addition for the removal if it expires and not <br />145 actively being renewed the City can go in and remove it. <br />146 <br />147 Member Luongo thought they were also waiting on some language for ADA <br />148 compliance because there is a Section J but there was not any wording in that <br />149 section. <br />150 <br />151 Mr. Freihammer explained the City will clarify some language on that. <br />152 <br />153 Member Rudolf indicated she had a question about Section K versus Section M. <br />154 The last sentence of Section K says, "Signage shall be affixed only to the street- <br />155 side portion of the bench backrest' and in Section M it says, "Advertising may be <br />156 displayed on the front and rear faces of the backrest." <br />157 <br />158 Mr. Freihammer indicated that was a good catch. Staff added Section M to clarify, <br />159 and he thought Section M clearly conflicts with Section K. He thought staff could <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />Page 6 of 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.