Laserfiche WebLink
f the Rice Creek Watershed District indicated that their inspector was <br />2. <br />Ms. Bonita Thorp o complete work on an <br />frust <br />rated with the length of time it took Northwestern 995 his repgorrt indicates that required <br />outlet that was permitted in 1992 arks July 31, conceptual <br />grass was not growing on pond b <br />3. The planning file <br />for the Northwestern College planned unit development haa�ng P <br />' n report prepared by TKDA and Associates that includes a space programming, <br />building plans <br />design P <br />formula that has a total gross building square footage <br />of edruced ° <br />form tion show a building <br />submitted for ermi awtaL <br />Tom- In icated that the building had be f reduced <br />feet There <br />duced in <br />square foots e of 54 000 sq. hest wall elevation o Dint which e <br />size to t the college budget. The plans °o her 12 f et in the air at the mid p trees <br />is <br />is a gabled end for the roof that extendsure <br />away from the wall section facing the lake. With �a lake during the <br />mat <br />approximately 50 feetY <br />alongthe slope to the lake, the building should not be visible acros <br />trees lose their leaves, a filtered view of the building will be there. <br />summer• When the t art of the approval <br />4. <br />Mr. Kallahan seemed to remember a floor ele th PUofD90 bmittap was at 918. The building <br />process. The first floor elevation indicate in <br />first floor elevation o� 917. Evidently, at one time before budget <br />under construction has a f the college had programmed <br />constraints and trying to meet A.DA access requirements, <br />the mnasium and the elevation of this lower�a� el would <br />office and storage space below gY rade has decreased somew <br />be approximately 906. Overall, the height above g <br />tion with Mr. Kallahan, Bob Rosenquist and I visited <br />the <br />site to <br />5. Following our conversa new <br />asure setbacks from the slope and the t seshok froes City <br />eep1sslopes and a 75 foot setback <br />me require <br />a 50 foot setback <br />Management Ordinance <br />h water mark of lakes. Our measurements indicated tlus feet fromhat the <br />from the ordinary hig <br />poi <br />nt of the building was 69 feet from the beginning of the slope an <br />the shore of the lake. <br />center under construction on the Northwestern1986 and as the <br />ege <br />To summarize, the physical educationproved in <br />is consistent with the planned unit develindicate, <br />he size and mass of the building have been <br />campus in <br />attached site plans from 1986 and 1994 t di at , es and the lake shore <br />• 'n is being constructed at the elevation indicated in the P� approved <br />reduced. The building requirements for both P with <br />1986 and is located well beyond the setback r eq While I have not <br />its. The concerns Mr. Kallahan raised aboubehwell founded complying <br />setback requireme ear to <br />the office staff has sent me <br />requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed <br />Ek1D1�thetDapnct's inspector, e I would <br />been able to talk directly with Mr e staff and the building contractor, <br />' ' in ection notes expressing some frustration with the college <br />copies of Mx. Eklin s p <br />that myself and City inspectors impress upon colements of the Rice Creek Watershed <br />suggest <br />Kraus Anderson, the need to be responsive to <br />past permits and for the requirements of current permits. <br />District, both for p P <br />