My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01626
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1600-1699
>
pf_01626
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 4:00:27 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1626
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />PLANNING REPORT <br />DATE: <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />• <br />3 September 1985 <br />1609 <br />Graham Investment, Inc. <br />Southeasterly of the <br />Intersection of Roselawn <br />Avenue and Lexington <br />Avenue (see sketch) <br />Rezoning of Land from R-1, <br />B-1, and B-2 to B-3, and <br />Approval of Special Use <br />Permit for Off -Sale Liquor <br />Store <br />1. The applicant, Mr. Robert Graham, has made arrangements to <br />purchase the Cath property south and east of Ace's Service <br />Station at the southeast corner of Roselawn and Lexington <br />Avenue. He proposes to construct an off -sale liquor store <br />70 feet by 130 feet equalling 9,100 square feet on the <br />prope , uare feet. This is the <br />property that was formerly proposed for Nolan's Supermarket, <br />which was turned down by the City primarily because the <br />proposed structure was too large for the limited site (which <br />at that time included the service station). The current <br />proposal includes a stricture relatively small for this site <br />as evidenced by the fact that, though forty-six parking <br />spaces are required to serve the proposed structure, <br />fifty-three parking spaces are proposed in the plan. No <br />variances are proposed or required for the projected <br />development. <br />2. Perhaps the principal problem with the proposal, as noted by <br />the engineering staff, is that two driveways are proposed on <br />Lexington Avenue and two driveways on Roselawn Avenue. They <br />suggest that with the size of the structure as proposed and <br />the known traffic conditions on both Lexington and Roselawn <br />Avenue that a single driveway to each street would be <br />adequate. The engineering staff will comment further on <br />these conditions, suggesting which of the driveways may be <br />considered for elimination. <br />3. Sixteen and one-half feet of right-of-way is proposed for <br />dedicat ion`-aZ- required on t eas_ t side of Lexing�ton Avenue <br />and the setback for the parking areas are establis�ie$ at 15 <br />feet as required by ordinance. <br />P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.