My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01548
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2024 9:16:00 AM
Creation date
2/22/2024 9:02:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1548
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE NUMBER: 1548-84 0 <br />APPLICANT:- Health Resources Assistance Corp. Page 2 <br />4. Attached -is a copy of a letter from Mrs. Slawik stating her intentions <br />regarding Lot 1. This lot is not proposed to be rezoned at this time. <br />5. The engineer indicates that Lot 3 will require an extension to the <br />sanitary sewer to serve this lot. This extension is shown on the plan <br />which should be petitioned for as a public improvement. <br />David Drown also notes that the drainage plan is inadequate. The drainage <br />should be picked up in the parking lot and conveyed to the storm sewer <br />with a pipe system versus the proposed overland flow indicated on the <br />plan. The landscape plan may also require some adjustments so as to not. <br />have extensive planting on top of the sewer easement. This can be <br />accommodated by making the landscape plan conditional upon future staff <br />approval. <br />6. In, general, it would appear that this proposed facility will be a helpful <br />addition to the community, housed in a very attractive structure. The <br />land use plan indicates this land to be utilized for business purposes, <br />thus the rezoning proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />7. The principal problem with the proposal appears to be wits, the ultimate <br />disposition of Lot 1. It may be appropriate to approve the preliminary <br />plat subject to the City Attorney's review of the adequacy of Mrs. <br />Slawik's statement regarding the ultimate use of the land. The proposal <br />requested then is for approval of the rezoning of the property from I-1 to <br />B-2 for Lots 2 and 3, and the approval of the preliminary plat. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.