My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01547
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2024 9:14:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2024 9:02:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1547
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />.• : �- <br />1 <br />Oxi,e'- an <br />.- <br />ik.naneing <br />ought <br />.++�wyrl Stfpr� <br />f � rfter - <br />The <br />�`_ -_ tropolitan Waste Control <br />on Was asked 'laesdsa�y to <br />. <br />t a . #S 6 'Million Processing <br />�- plaWIM tens and <br />Cities area met- <br />Aeir touc wastesfor recy <br />The �ropo�l was submitted <br />t1Y by the- ,,etropolitan Recov- <br />i IM�F-.��a_�n, mLLd_u''stry group whm <br />ude <br />� Qs( sAM of Pittsburgh, <br />_ •area_�����1 <br />Company. <br />engneerfilg <br />. About 65 small electr°oplgtizig <br />MOPS and clrcuit board mandac- <br />Citie <br />the the Twin 0( their n to now wash <br />solations awn <br />al ftho <br />drains, am into <br />metropolitan area wvr& <br />se ; <br />Waste residues coatabdag kne' <br />•-Y- <br />cept and treat such wastes, Indus- within five yeah. lit to ther�afahess <br />try spokesmen say, .1,500 jobs <br />pwould be lost at Twin Cities Under state law, the recovery <br />� t would have Pit would have to be construct d <br />at one of 13 <br />they cant afford t areas designated by <br />treatment systems of their own. o� Waste Management <br />Waste Control Commission ardous oard paste sites for haz- <br />members adopted a resolution Two of those sites are in StPlan <br />a <br />one is il is <br />Tu <br />esday urging the Metropolitan n <br />Council to approve the Project.' The •RosevMe. � and one is in <br />C0°ucil retdews the sewer authori- <br />t5''s capital expenditures and coon- 7i signed m@ finishers! group has <br />cil approval would a needed be-- a Purchase agreement for a <br />fore the authority use public Possible construction site in ? ��' �e- <br />funds to finance construction of the a�ljsl according to Daniel Shuster, <br />central recovery Tacility. • • resident of the group. However <br />The metal refinishers want the aste Control Commission offi- <br />commission to Pay for the buildingvials said the purchase agreement <br />site, construction costs and would not be binding on the sewer <br />Menr for the recycling pbmt � ' auth4�ty should it decide to help <br />finance the project. .: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.