Laserfiche WebLink
Olmsted County Resource Recovery Facility EAW <br />April, 1984 <br />24ae continued <br />e Rochester area is designated attainmer., for to al suspended particulates (TSP), lead, oxides tof niit <br />trogrl <br />en he criteria pot ozanes <br />New ,ource Review requirements in nonattainment areas apply t new sources <br />whicl emit 100 tons per year (TPY) or more of the pollutant or which the <br />area nonattainment. Estimated annual emissions of 502 rom the proposed <br />facilit will exceed 100 TPY. Estimated CO emissions ar less than 100 TPY. <br />Facility must control their emissions of nonattainme pollutants to the <br />lowest ach evable emission rate (LAER). In offset then w emissions must be met. Offsetsaareon�nt to <br />ductionsrineemiss <br />of a pollutan at another source in the area. Off ets are measured in <br />lons <br />tons per year o the nonattainment <br />,pollutant. <br />Since the Rochestis nonattainment for a S02 ambient air quality <br />standards (AAQS) :\ntheproposed facility i a major source of S02, <br />LAER must be demoand emissions of et for S02. These require- <br />mE�nts do not applemissions since lie proposed facility is not a <br />major source of Cttainment requi ements will apply unless the <br />area is redesignattainment pri to pezmittin of th f ' <br />For a nc-r source to be iss d <br />-'st be offset by reducing t e <br />ea by a 1.1 to 1 amount or <br />xemption provisions can be ut <br />�tructed when offsets ,ire not, <br />g e acility. <br />an ai emissions facility permit, S02 E '.ssions <br />S02 emissions of an existing source in k.he <br />or If sufficient offsets are not available, <br />zed which allow such facilities to be con- <br />ilable . <br />A possible scenario for th propos Campus facility is to offset its <br />emissionsby the retiremen of the lens at the Associated Milk Producers <br />(AMPI) facility. Negot bons are cu rentl underway to ' Inc' <br />facility with its xe y Y provide the AMpI <br />qu ed steam from a Campus facility. Assuming that <br />these negotiations ar successful, and I agrees to limit or eliminate <br />use of its boilers part of the needed ffset may be available. <br />The MPCA 1980 em4ision inventory data Indic es that the AMPI facility <br />emitted 58 TPY 'of SO2. Thus, the proposed wa to to energy Campus facilityes <br />estimated annual emissions could be reduced by 58 TPY. However, the offset <br />rule requires/that a net reduction in S02 emirs ns of equal to or greater <br />than 132 TPY be obtained. <br />In addition, the MPCA's proposed administrative pot y <br />wide ceiling on sulfur dioxide emissions requires tha <br />of greater than 100 TPY due to the operation of a new <br />offset by an equivalent reduction in sulfur dioxide emi <br />sensitive areas. <br />3c <br />regarding the state- <br />S02 emissions <br />ource must be <br />4 ions in acid rain <br />