Laserfiche WebLink
11 'b ,' Ch � SSS, L,A u')S <br />N i� PPL 1�)i <br />"Movinp Mankind Toward Safety From fire" <br />Richard L. Sorensen <br />Fire Marshal <br />City of Albert Lea <br />221 East Clark Street <br />Albert Lea, Minnesota 56007 <br />Dear Marshal Sorensen: <br />NATIONAL <br />FIRE PROTECTION <br />ASSOCIATION. <br />INIERNATIONAL <br />Life Safety Field Service I <br />i <br />Engineering Services Division -% <br />June 11, 1984 <br />W"' a <br />This is in response to your letter dated May 7, 1984 to the Editor of <br />Fire Journal, which I have already received numerous copies of from <br />several different sources. ' <br />I must agree with you that the revisions or changes made by the State <br />are quite significant and can lead, in my personal opinion, to a very <br />dangerous situation when considering the ages and abilities of the <br />people involved in day care facilities. <br />The change regarding day care centers with fewer.than 80 children, would <br />appear to allow all of the exiting from the basement of a day care center <br />to be through the first floor. In other words, if there were a fire on <br />the first floor, everyone would be trapped in the basement. Thq Life <br />Safety Code, both the present 1981 edition and the proposed 1985 edition, <br />are designed to insure that at least one exit from the basement level <br />would discharge directly outside providing a protected path of travel <br />for the children in the basement in the event of a fire on the first floor. <br />I can see no substantiation for the change made to this by the legislature <br />of the State of Minnesota. This is not a difficult requirement with which <br />to comply and is the basic intent of the requirements in almost all other <br />occupancies with very few exceptions. <br />It is interesting to note that the legislature has required a comprehensive <br />study of the issues surrounding licensure of these facilities. I would <br />like to point out that the provisions in the Life Safety Code were based <br />on a comprehensive report prepared by the federal government in the early <br />1970's. This study resulted in guidelines for regulations which were <br />issued by the, then, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, now the <br />Department of Education. The Life Safety Code follows these guidelines <br />quite closely and, in fact, had representatives involved in the study. It <br />may be of interest to determine whether the facilities which would comply <br />with the revisions done by the State of Minnesota would still be eligible <br />for federal funding as they would appear not to comply with the federal <br />guidelines for day care facilities. In addition, I would like to point out <br />A statement, written or oral, that is not processed in accordance with Section 16 of the NFPA's Regulations Goveming Committee Projects shall not be <br />considered the official position of NFPA or any of Its Committers and shelf not be considered to be, nor relied upon as, a Formal Interpretation. <br />EXECUTIVE OFFICE: BATTERYMARCH PARK, QUINCY, MASSACHUSETTS, U. S. A.02269 *TELEPHONE (617) 77DOM a TELEX 944)720 <br />The non-profit technical and educational organization: To promote the science and improve the methods of fire protection and prevention: to obtain and <br />ceicuiste information on these subjects and to secure the cooperation of Its member& and the public in establishing proper safeguards against loss of life <br />and properly by lire. <br />