pf_01500 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

000 ROS E VI LLE PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT CO. E 2660 North Cleveland, St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 - (612) 633-6312 Planning Commission City Of Roseville 2660 Civic Center Dii-ve Roseville, MN. 55113 Attention: Ron Moorse RE: Comme rs -K lodt County Road C Developmemt Proposal Gentlemen , May 14, 1984 This letter is in regards to our proposed high Lechnology Office - Warehouse Development on the site being acquired from 1st Trust Company of St.Paul, 1st National Bank of St.Paul and Anthony Marabella, along County Road C near the S t.Anthony City limits. We have filed a request for variances relative to Building - Parking lot setback requirements from County Road C and the proposed new roadway to be constructed (Commers Drive). Following are several of the most apparent reasons for the variance requests: 1. A substantial part of the storm water ponding area for Vertimag Systems Corporation immediately to the north of the subject is located on the north end of the pro- posed development site. The presence of this unusable ponding area requires that the building development be moved further to the south than would otherwise be nec- cessary. 2. The storm water ponding area that has to be excavated within the limits of the subject property must be"over- sized" to accomodate runoff from other adjoining pro- perites. The properties from which storm water runoff must be temporarily ponded on the Commers-Klodt site include the 8.82 Acre Rihm Motor Company site, the northerly .86 acre of the adjoining Marabella owner- ship, and the 3.91 acres Vertimag Systems Corporation property. Again, the necessity to provide holding pond capacity for other than the project area land results in the placement of the proposed high technology office - warehouse structure further to the south. 3. The construction of proposed Commers Drive within primarily what is now the Marabella ownership, and the installation of sanitary sewer and water facili- ties along the new road right-of-way, will result in unusually high assessments against the subject property (about 58� per square foot of land area).