My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01469
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1400-1499
>
pf_01469
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2024 10:32:59 AM
Creation date
2/22/2024 10:31:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1469
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s <br />/ � ,y4l;irsl'1t�dEE`�� T,A 55 1 13 <br />0 0 <br />V I <br />S <br />EN <br />TER ORIVE +E'"HoNE 484-337 1 <br />2660 CIVIC C <br />20, 1984 <br />Aug <br />ust <br />Mr. Richard Robbins <br />3240 Owasso sleights <br />55112 <br />Shoreview, NW <br />duplex at <br />Dear b1r. Robbins: the future of the existing ially <br />duplex is currently located P 10 feet Of <br />letter is to cla ag wi9it � <br />This existing of an additi thel duplex The dedication d <br />2764 Victoright_of_way. After 10 feet of change tt <br />We <br />°n County along Victo�ri;�, <br />an addition dedication does not <br />right-of-way of -way. The additional <br />ht-of- mean, vtt. <br />on County rig duplex* does not <br />status of the dup on public right -Of -way the futu,� <br />ilex is some time in the <br />The fact that the did However, if at request lt <br />down• County will probably req of the <br />e removed or torn the The relocation <br />must b widens Victoria, ht-of_way• <br />Ramsey County cif the rig ermitted- <br />the duplex be move�o Offerty would be P use;.. <br />duplex onto your proper ally non -conforming roh .bi�n'�' <br />calls a leg ordinance P <br />what the City the City had all residemrj� DR <br />The duplex is before 111 a single family <br />was constructed build a duplex The City has <br />This means it illegal t° public Tight but may not 'be*wdl <br />it. Today, it is remain not e <br />build a structure on P uses malex, but You may <br />zone, °r t0 ally non -conforming the duplex, <br />fined that leg and repaix <br />determ You may maintain <br />expanded. <br />it. <br />If you have further questions, <br />gel : b c <br />please contact me. <br />Sincerel <br />A <br />Ron Moorse <br />AIlministrative Assistant <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.