My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2024_0212
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2024
>
CC_Minutes_2024_0212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2024 3:02:24 PM
Creation date
2/27/2024 3:02:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/12/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 12, 2024 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted often times with hearings and things like that sometimes it <br /> needs to be done as the EDA, so he was not sure if Mayor Roe meant when the City <br /> is having their public hearings that the EDA does theirs at the same time. <br /> Mayor Roe explained the City Council and staff want to make sure the EDA is not <br /> left out of what is being looked at during the end of year tax hearing for the rest of <br /> the operations that the EDA is a part of <br /> Councilmember Schroeder thought this was a part of the process and it should go <br /> before the Finance Commission. She noted the Council never received updates on <br /> the fund balance,until she asked for it. Making it similar to the rest of it would be <br /> her thought. She would like to make sure that the Council gets the fund balance of <br /> the EDA, as well as the budget because when looking at it,the Council was able to <br /> see how healthy that fund is too,but most people did not know that. She understood <br /> legally there are things that needed to be done separately but the whole process and <br /> how the Council is updated on this and having the Finance Commission look at it <br /> as well. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated the third item is the notion of trying to break down the"Other" <br /> Budget Expense category and if it should be broken down into major components. <br /> He gave some examples for the Council to consider. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked if staff would pull apart services and contracts or <br /> would it be asked to have those delineated to the detail of the exact service. <br /> Mayor Roe meant for it to be one category and he just listed some examples in his <br /> handout of what would be in that category. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked if there would be a point such as a certain percentage <br /> of an area's budget or where would that line be. <br /> Mayor Roe explained his concern with that is on the report it starts out with four or <br /> five categories and expands to fifteen or more categories because one particular <br /> fund has over five percent and only in that fund. The funds cannot be cross <br /> compared over the whole organization. He indicated in the handout he gave to the <br /> Council that summarized everything, there is detail provided under the budget <br /> detail by function in various areas and/or in the plus/minus for the year. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder indicated even if this does not break it down a lot more, <br /> it sounds better than"Other". She thought if it is "Services and Contracts" at least <br /> it tells everyone what it is. She thought more detail could be done for a particular <br /> fund such as a sub-report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.