My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2024_0212
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2024
>
CC_Minutes_2024_0212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2024 3:02:24 PM
Creation date
2/27/2024 3:02:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/12/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 12, 2024 <br /> Page 4 <br /> No. 1656 entitled,"An Ordinance Summary of the Amendment to Title 9,Creating <br /> Chapter 912 of the Roseville City Code in Order to Establish an Affordable <br /> Housing Trust Fund" <br /> Roll Call (2/3 Majority Required) <br /> Ayes: Strahan, Etten, Schroeder, Groff, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None <br /> b. Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Revising Regulations Related to Short <br /> Term Rentals and Restarting Issuance of Short-Term Rental Licenses <br /> Community Development Director Janice Gundlach and Code Enforcement <br /> Official Dave Englund briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the Request for <br /> Council Action and related attachments dated February 12, 2024. <br /> Ms. Gundlach went through the changes staff made in the bench handout with the <br /> City Council. She noted the changes were very minor. <br /> Councilmember Strahan explained for a point of clarification that the notice to the <br /> neighbors is not for their agreement or disagreement; the license has already been <br /> granted by the time the neighborhood is alerted. She thought it was important to <br /> point that out. She wondered if at some point the Council wanted to discuss limiting <br /> the number of properties. There was no mention about how the City will be alerted <br /> to non-compliant properties,questioning what the process would be for notification <br /> to the City. She noted there are some currently licensed locations advertising that <br /> they can have ten to fourteen people in their facility. She thought it was important <br /> to remind people with the licenses that they are still bound by the rules regarding <br /> limitations to one family. She also did not see anything indicating what the rate of <br /> the local lodging tax would be. She wondered if that will be applied for the nights <br /> that people occupy the home or for the full seven-to-ten-day potential stay based <br /> on how the ordinance is written. <br /> Ms. Gundlach believed the lodging tax was a percentage of the gross sales by City <br /> Ordinance. The other concern about the number of people in a rental, a single- <br /> family home can be occupied by a single family and as long as they are related, it <br /> can be as many people as are related. But,the short-term rental ordinance does not <br /> prohibit somebody from using a short-term rental for a party. A family could be <br /> staying in a short-term rental and decide to have a party with others they can <br /> certainly do that.There are provisions in the short-term rental ordinance about noisy <br /> parties and gatherings or other issues that could cause the police to be called or for <br /> staff to go out and observe a violation that could be subject to suspension or <br /> revocation at a future time but there is nothing that would prohibit somebody from <br /> allowing sixteen people from being in a short-term rental. She reviewed the ways <br /> that the City finds out about short-term rentals in the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.