Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Feedback and Proposed direction for reframing of HRIEC work <br />This proposal is meant to start a conversation within the City Council and with the <br />community. More work and community input is needed before moving forward. <br />WHY are we considering changes? <br />Over the years the current Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission has held <br />several forms, three names, and taken on many different purposes. Dozens of commissioners <br />have put in hundreds of hours of work on behalf of the City and the community. Their work and <br />dedication have helped make Roseville better. <br /> The City’s needs are changing as laws change at the State level, as society changes, and as <br />our community becomes more diverse. Human Rights are critical in our city and our world. We <br />have seen in other parts of the country and our world that human rights are not to be taken for <br />granted. At the same time, the City has little statutory authority over human rights, with that <br />power lying with the State of Minnesota and the Federal Government. This legal separation has <br />created some misunderstandings of purpose for the commission over time. <br />The City has also made major strides in engagement work including the shifting of our <br />communications department to a Community Relations department, staff training in the IAP2 <br />community engagement model and the development of our Racial Equity Toolkit. The <br /> Commission’s work on engagement both when split as a Community Engagement Commission <br />and in its current HRIEC form have helped make these deeper changes possible. <br />The HRIEC with its current purpose, scope and duties and in its current format has struggled to <br />find relevance in serving the City and the City Council and to create a sense of meaningful <br />volunteer work for members. On average it has lost 2/3rds of its membership each year over <br />the last five years. We do not have a model that is serving the City the way the Council or <br />appointed commission members desire. <br />Subcommittee members and City staff have met with Culture Brokers and several current and <br />former members of the HRIEC as well as other diverse leaders in our community over the last <br />few months. <br />Two major themes have come forward in these discussions. First, over the last five to ten years <br />the City has made substantial changes to operations and staff including participating in the <br />GARE process, creating the SREAP, creating an Equity and Inclusion Manager position, and <br />having ongoing staff training around equity and community engagement. The State of MN has <br />also made a number of changes including approving same sex marriage and is working towards <br />correcting many historial wrongs for human rights. Building on this work is important. A second <br />major theme is that many current and former HRIEC Commissioners feel like the purposes <br />outlined in City Code by the City Council do not match their interests or what they find valuable <br />for their time. We have lost many valuable commission members to the frustrations caused by <br />this mismatch. We need to reevaluate what can best move the City forward as well as provide <br />an avenue for robust and meaningful community input. <br />The most common feeling expressed is that the focus needs to be on systemic changes in the <br />area of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. This work needs to be impactful for the City and its <br />residents and it needs to be valuable to those serving in volunteer roles. We are proposing to <br />Qbhf!59!pg!62 <br /> <br />