My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01292024
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
CCP 01292024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2024 2:18:21 PM
Creation date
3/20/2024 2:17:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/29/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motor NP NP C C P Y <br />vehicle <br />repair, <br />auto body <br />shop <br />29 <br />30 24. Motor Fuel Sales, Motor Vehicle Repair, Body Shop: <br />31 a. Pump Islands and Canopies: The centerline of pump islands (or the outer edge of a pump island <br />32 canopy, if present) shall be a minimum of 25 feet from a property line. <br />33 b. Driveways: Driveways shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from the street right-of-way lines of the <br />34 nearest intersection. <br />35 c. Outdoor Display Sales Area: All outdoor display sales areas shall be limited to 250 square feet, shall <br />36 not be located in pump area, and shall require an Outdoor Display Sales Permit and site plan to be <br />37 approved by the Community Development Department. <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 Policy Objectives <br />41 The Zoning Code exists to divide the City into districts and establish regulations in regard to land and the <br />42 buildings thereon. <br />43 <br />44 Racial Equity Impact Summary <br />45 Racial equity impacts were not evaluated for this request. <br />46 <br />47 Budget Implications <br />48 Not Applicable <br />49 <br />50 Staff Recommendations <br />51 On January 3, 2024, the Roseville Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing on the <br />52 request by Troy Miller for a Zoning Code Text Amendment in support of changing motor vehicle repair, <br />53 auto body shop from a use not permitted in the MU-1 district to a conditional use in the MU-1 district. <br />54 The Planning Commission asked staff to expand on why a rezoning of the property to MU-3 was a less <br />55 desirable option compared to the zoning code text amendment. Staff indicated that rezoning the <br />56 property to MU-3 would open the property up to numerous permitted uses that may not be appropriate <br />57 for the property, given potential impacts to adjacent residential properties. Additionally, not all the uses <br />58 permitted in the MU-3 district could be developed on the subject property due to the design and <br />59 development standards that would apply given the smaller area of the property. Staff maintains the CU <br />60 process is a more appropriate process, given this specific situation, as it affords the City an opportunity <br />61 to review and analyze potential impacts and seek remedies. Staff also suggested rezoning the parcel <br />62 could be deemed a “spot zone”’ as the higher intensity mixed-use district does not fit well with the other <br />63 adjacent zoning districts and this zoning pattern would be inconsistent with other areas of the City. If the <br />64 Zoning Code Text Amendment is approved, realistically, any site that is zoned MU-1 could request a CU <br />65 for the "motor vehicle repair/auto body shop" use. However, any site where automotive repair is <br />66 proposed, whether through a change in use, redevelopment, or new development, all standards of the <br />67 Zoning Code would apply. Given most MU-1-zoned properties are smaller in land area, it would likely be <br />68 difficult to comply with many applicable Code requirements. <br />69 <br />70 After discussion and deliberation, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend to the City Council <br />71 approval of the requested Zoning Code Text Amendment to Table 1005-1 as recommended by the <br />72 Roseville Planning Division. <br />73 <br />74 Requested Council Action <br />75 By Motion, adopt an Ordinance (Attachment 2) approving an amendment to Table 1005-1 (Mixed-Use <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Qbhf!25!pg!367 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.