My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-04-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2024
>
2024-04-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 2:32:27 PM
Creation date
6/25/2024 2:32:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/23/2024
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Freihammer indicated some of the schools do track that information, he just <br />was not sure if it is just for bikers or for walkers as well. Staff could tap into that <br />for information. <br />Member Luongo noted there is an association called BikeMN and she thought that <br />staff could reach out to that organization to see if anyone in Roseville participates <br />in that. <br />Mr. Freihammer concluded the bike plan presentation. <br />9. County Road C 4:3 Conversion Project Presentation <br />Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer reviewed the County Road C 4:3 <br />conversion project with the Commission. <br />Chair Ficek indicated the speed limit is 40 MPH and he wondered if this will be <br />looked at. <br />Mr. Freihammer anticipated that will be look at and have done others recently. If <br />bike lanes are put in place that will be an automatic thing to look at. This was not <br />commented on at the meeting. <br />Chair Ficek asked regarding the intersections if these will remain all -way stops at <br />the key locations. <br />Mr. Freihammer indicated at the Victoria intersection a roundabout is very much <br />an option in the future, but for the current project these will still be signed as all - <br />way stops. The County is looking long term to either put a signal at the <br />intersection or a roundabout. The railroad is a little bit of a caveat with these <br />intersections. He personally thought a roundabout would work well at that <br />intersection and will be done at their evaluation portion of the project. <br />Member Fergus indicated other than consideration of the speed limit and it may <br />have to change, are there any negatives to making the shoulder a bike lane. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained offhand there is not, it is just a signing and striping <br />thing, but the County typically leaves it open as a blank slate and can be easily <br />added or removed. <br />Chair Ficek thanked Mr. Freihammer for the update. <br />10. Future Agenda Items <br />Discussion ensued regarding future agenda items: <br />• MS 4 Annual meeting in May <br />• Trout Brook Interceptor Flood Analysis in May <br />• Civic Campus Master Plan Update in May <br />• Prep for the Joint Council meeting in June <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.