My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 08192024
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
CCP 08192024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2024 3:41:49 PM
Creation date
9/27/2024 3:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
8/19/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />35 months, which included online surveys for both business owners and residents, a landing <br />36 page on the City website with information, resources, and context, and two community <br />37 conversations for business owners and residents to learn about the proposed ordinance <br />38 and provide feedback. <br />39 <br />40 Staff drafted a Green To Go ordinance based on language from the City of Edina’s Green <br />41 To Go ordinance, which used language from both the City of Minneapolis and the City of <br />42 Saint Louis Park’s respective ordinances. Staff worked with the Roseville City Attorney to <br />43 update and refine the language for relevancy to Ramsey County, and to reflect Roseville’s <br />44 proposed exclusions and enforcement. If council wishes to move forward, staff will post the <br />45 ordinance and bring back the final ordinance for adoption at a later date. <br />46 <br />47 Policy Objectives <br />48 The City of Roseville set forth a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80% by 2050 <br />49 relative to 2005 levels. Solid waste disposal accounts for 2.3% of greenhouse gas <br />50 emissions in the City of Roseville as of 2020. <br />51 <br />52 Equity Impact Summary <br />53 This ordinance would apply to all Roseville restaurants. We do not have racial <br />54 demographics of restaurant ownership in Roseville. However, a National Restaurant <br />55 Association study indicates that 19% of restaurant businesses in Minnesota are minority- <br />56 owned vs. 11% of all private sector businesses. Racial disparities in business ownership <br />57 can present in overall earnings, growth, and access to loans and other credit, and BIPOC- <br />58 owned businesses in Roseville may have narrower profit margins than white-owned <br />59 businesses. <br />60 <br />61 Budget Implications <br />62 Budget implications are not known at this time. <br />63 <br />64 Staff Recommendations <br />65 Staff recommends a discussion of the engagement findings, and recommend Council <br />66 receive feedback on the draft ordinance. If council moves this forward, staff will bring back <br />67 the ordinance for adoption at a later date. <br />68 <br />69 Requested Council Action <br />70 Discuss the Green To Go engagement results and proposed ordinance. <br />71 <br />72 <br />Noelle Bakken, Sustainability Specialist <br />Prepared by: <br />1. Green To Go Update Presentation <br />Attachments: <br />2. Green To Go Survey Results <br />3. Green To Go Draft Ordinance <br />4. Equity Toolkit <br />73 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Qbhf!21!pg!417 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.