CCP 09232024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RCA Attachment 2 1 a. Consider a Request to Subdivide a Parcel from the West End of the Roseville 2 Covenant Church Property and Re-Guide and Rezone it for Low-to-Medium- 3 Density Residential Development (PF24-004) 4 Chair Pribyl opened the public hearing for PF24-004 at approximately 6:37 p.m. and 5 reported on the purpose and process of a public hearing. She advised this item will be 6 before the City Council on September 23, 2024. 7 8 Senior Planner Lloyd summarized the request as detailed in the September 4, 2024, 9 staff report. He noted three community members reached out to City staff with 10 concerns and opposition to this proposal. 11 12 Member Bauer asked if the Commission follows staff recommendation of allowing 13 this MDR and guiding it LDR for the Comprehensive Plan would the 3.6 max 14 allowed be correct? 15 16 Mr. Lloyd indicated that was correct. He noted mathematically it would be an 8-unit- 17 per-acre density maximum of about 20,000 square feet would be approximately 3.6 18 units. 19 20 Member McGehee indicated the City does not have any obligation to change the 21 Comprehensive Plan and change the zoning and can remain institutional. 22 23 Mr. Lloyd noted that was correct. 24 25 Member McGehee explained she drove by this area and it is a heavily 26 apartment/duplex area and this is one of the only places with large mature trees which 27 is noted in the report. It seemed to her that people do use that and it does provide 28 privacy for the residential neighborhood. 29 30 Chair Pribyl explained regarding cash in-lieu-of parkland, this is an unusual proposal 31 because proposals coming before the Commission are usually from a developer, and 32 in this case, it is the church coming forward to plat a separate lot but is not proposing 33 to do the development and it is unlikely conceivable that the lot will not be sold in the 34 immediate future and have it developed and yet the church is being tasked with 35 paying the cash in-lieu-of parkland fee, assuming it will be developed. She wondered 36 if that was automatic. She wondered if that should be assigned to the church or a 37 future developer. 38 39 Mr. Lloyd explained the typical procedure is once the City is ready to release the plat 40 documents to be recorded at Ramsey County, that is when the applicant pays the park 41 dedication fee and is required. There have in the past been some mechanisms by 42 which park dedication was required at a plat approval but not collected until a builder 43 acquired a property and began building. That was before his time working for the 44 City. He did not think it would be surprising for the church to pass that cost along to 45 a potential buyer. There is no mechanism to delay the initial payment. 46 47 Mr. John Holter, Business Administrator at Roseville Covenant Church was at the 48 meeting for questions. 49 Qbhf!36!pg!345