My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 10212024
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
CCP 10212024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2025 12:06:46 PM
Creation date
1/13/2025 12:06:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
10/21/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
94 o Section 1011.12.E, additional standards for specific business and commercial uses in all <br />95 districts, has been edited to reflect the footnote references within the Table of Allowed <br />96 Uses sections. <br />97 The Planning Commission reviewed the draft zoning ordinance at their meeting on October 2, <br />98 2024. While the Commission engaged in general conversations surrounding the regulation of adult-use <br />99 cannabis, they did not recommend any revisions to the draft ordinance provided as Attachment 4. The <br />100 Planning Commission was not engaged on either the registration or events ordinance, given these <br />101 regulations will exist outside the Zoning Code. <br />102 <br />103 Staff is seeking feedback on the draft ordinances, especially the items highlighted by the City Attorney <br />104 so that the draft ordinances can be finalized for future adoption. The Planning Commission intends to <br />105 hold the required public hearing on the zoning amendments on November 6, 2024. This leaves two City <br />106 Council meetings, November 25, 2024 and December 2, 2024, for ordinance adoption before the <br />107 January 1, 2025 deadline. <br />108 <br />109 Policy Objectives <br />110 To implement the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 342, and to authorize the City of Roseville to <br />111 protect the public health, safety, and welfare of Roseville residents by regulating cannabis businesses <br />112 within the legal boundaries of the City of Roseville. To find and conclude such ordinances are <br />113 appropriate and lawful land use regulation for the City of Roseville, that the regulations will promote the <br />114 community's interest in reasonable stability in zoning for now and in the future, and that the provided <br />115 provisions are in the public interest and for the public good. <br />116 <br />117 Equity Impact Summary <br />118 The City of Roseville has a limited role in the regulation of adult-use cannabis. Most of the city's <br />119 influence stems from it's zoning authority, which affects owners of commercial property and business <br />120 owners who intend to run a cannabis business. Decisions surrounding where such businesses may <br />121 locate within the city are based on already established zoning allowances. For example, the <br />122 manufacturing or retail sales of cannabis are allowed in zoning districts that already allow manufacturing <br />123 and retail sales of other goods. Proposed regulations, aside from zoning authority, are being informed <br />124 by existing alcohol and tobacco regulations, which have been established and enforced for decades. <br />125 <br />126 The state will seek zoning compliance certification from the City of Roseville before deciding whether to <br />127 issue a business license for a cannabis business/use. The State Office of Cannabis Management <br />128(OCM) has established a social equity process to help ensure corporations and/or deep-pocketed <br />129 investors cannot monopolize the business of manufacturing and selling cannabis in Minnesota. The <br />130 social equity process established by OCM intends for those who have suffered the most from cannabis <br />131 prohibition will be first in line to benefit from its legalization. <br />132 <br />133 Aside from age-compliance regulations surrounding the retail sale of cannabis, which will be conducted <br />134 locally, under the law OCM is tasked with general licensing enforcement. It should be recognized that <br />135 persons/parties will likely seek enforcement from the City of Roseville but will be burdened by the city's <br />136 lack of standing and referral to OCM, which could result in non-timely response to negative impacts. <br />137 <br />138 The impacts of the legalization of cannabis are not yet known, and the City must be prepared to amend <br />139 its regulations as needed to address mitigations within local control, including engaging with affected <br />140 parties within the community on those non-state mandated revisions. The fully completed Equity and <br />141 Inclusion Toolkit is provided as Attachment 5. <br />142 <br />143 Budget Implications <br />144 There are no budget impacts related to the drafting of ordinances. There are fee implications related to <br />145 retail registration and Temporary Cannabis Events. Retail sales of taxable cannabis products are <br />146 subject to the state and local sales and use tax and a 10% gross receipts tax. 20% of cannabis gross <br />147 receipts tax proceeds are allocated to the local government cannabis aid account, where 50% is <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Qbhf!52!pg!286 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.