My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02242025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 02242025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 10:03:48 AM
Creation date
2/25/2025 10:03:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/24/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 1 <br />Regular City Council Meeting Minutes <br />City Hall Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Monday, November 27, 2023 <br />a.Discussion on City Commissions Scope, Duties and Functions <br />Councilmember Etten briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the Request for <br />Council Action and related attachments dated November 27, 2023. <br />Councilmember Strahan appreciated that Councilmember Etten took this item on. <br />She thought if the Council had similar Commission wording to review, it would <br />help to make decisions easier. She also thought this was good for everyone involved <br />and a fabulous start. <br />Councilmember Schroeder agreed that the formats all need to be the same. She <br />thought the Finance Commission might be more involved with the other <br />commission to help them work on things and find out how financially it affects the <br />City and other things. When Councilmember Etten talked about getting people <br />together from other commissions to talk about things like sustainability, he actually <br />thought the idea of possibly having all of the chairs or some groups getting together <br />to talk about different things that could work together with the commissions. He <br />was a little disappointed that some commissions did so little, and did think that <br />there could be some cross commission work. He thought there needed to be some <br />discussion at a future meeting and maybe the Council needed to decide what they <br />wanted the commissions to actually do. <br />Councilmember Groff indicated he was very impressed that this got started by <br />Councilmember Etten. He likes what he has heard. He indicated he would want <br />more input on the number of commission meetings, especially if the commission <br />scope is changed, along with the number of members on each commission. <br />Mayor Roe indicated the HRIEC suggests the most substantial changes to their <br />Code so he thought it would make sense to have a joint discussion between the <br />Council and members of the HRIEC at a work session to talk through that. He <br />thought also, in that same conversation for any commission, where the Council is <br />talking about changing membership numbers or number of meetings and the <br />commission did not weigh in on that at all, he would want to make sure the Council <br />has the ability to have that conversation with that commission. Specifically, to the <br />HRIEC, he is very worried because the meeting is the only place where they can <br />really do their business, just like the Council meetings. He noted if the City limits <br />that opportunity, then the commission may not be able to do as much business and <br />the Council needs to understand that. He thought the Commission needed to be <br />able to weigh in on that. He was wondering about the idea of forming a working <br />group that periodically meets that is more informal among the chairs and vice- <br />Qbhf!72!pg!354 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.