My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02242025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 02242025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 10:03:48 AM
Creation date
2/25/2025 10:03:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/24/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 22, 2024 <br />Page 5 <br />never has or never would try to work through something without engaging City <br />staff. She thought the Commission was a conduit for the information. <br /> Vice-Chair Becker thought that is why the wording states “may serve as an <br /> advocate”, because that is where the Commission comes together and discusses <br />these things because there are multiple voices and perspectives to be heard. She <br />thought it was important that the Commission holds a space for that conversation <br />and dialogue and that the Commission may have to advocate for the individual <br />which the Commission would then present to the City Council as an issue that <br />maybe the City can resolve. She indicated the Council was correct about the <br /> wording “involving the City” but it might be that the City might in some way <br />support change. She thought there was probably some language adjustments that <br />still needed to be made. <br />Mayor Roe thought, as an example of something the City may have thought about <br />as hypothetical during the drafting process, was the notion that if through the receipt <br /> of individual people’s issues over time, and if the Commission sensed a trend about <br /> a particular type of infraction against somebody’s human rights seems to be <br />happening a lot in the community, perhaps then the Commission could say, not <br />specifically advocating on behalf of the individual, but explaining the issue seems <br />to be in the forefront of the community and the Commission has had some <br />discussions with possible solutions by the City and then make recommendations to <br />the City in that regard. <br />The Commission concurred. <br />Councilmember Schroeder wondered why the Commission removed the wording <br /> “Perform other duties and function as directed by the City Council.” <br />Commissioner Tidball explained he would not object to it being in there but the <br />paragraph right before that pretty much says how the Commission functions on a <br />regular basis. One would think in that whole process, whatever the Council wanted <br />the Commission to do or whatever the Commission felt it should be doing, should <br />all be taken care of. <br />Councilmember Schroeder explained the Council is trying to have consistency in <br />the formats of all the Commissions. <br />Commissioner Tidball thought if it helps in the whole process to have that sentence <br />in there, he did not see why the Commission would object. The sentence was not <br />put in there because it seemed redundant to what the Commission was writing. <br />Councilmember Groff tried to be involved in the discussion but was having audio <br />difficulties. <br />Qbhf!78!pg!354 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.