My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02242025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 02242025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 10:03:48 AM
Creation date
2/25/2025 10:03:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/24/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 11, 2024 <br />Page 10 <br /> Councilmember Strahan thought it was important to mention that the City’s SREAP is not just <br />about racial equity, but talks about any marginalized community and how the City can include <br />people. It is about the whole idea. It is about accessibility of people. <br />Mayor Roe stated the Council appreciated the public input and explained the Council needs to <br />provide the direction about where to go from here as a Commission. His initial thought is that <br />certainly he would like to see an opportunity for the members of the Commission to think about <br />what has been said at the meeting tonight, all the different thoughts about what the Commission <br />can do, and what the structure could be. He appreciates the feedback in terms of that as well. <br />He suggested this item be on the agenda for the next HRIEC meeting to have that conversation <br />about what has been talked about at this meeting and provide reflection and feedback to the <br />Council for subsequent discussion. Mayor Roe indicated speaking for himself, he does try to <br />follow all of the minutes of the meetings and to watch the videos as well. <br />Councilmember Groff asked how the Council feels about attending HRIEC meetings. <br />Mayor Roe thought if there are three or more Councilmembers at the meeting, there needs to <br />be separation without any conversations. He did not know if that was prohibited or not, but <br />the meeting could be posted as well. He explained he does not try to influence meetings he <br />attends and is very conscious of that. <br />Councilmember Strahan indicated she has encountered that as well and has absented herself <br />from being at the meetings so that her presence does not impact on the meeting. She noted the <br />Council is following and knows what is going on in the Commissions but certainly could know <br />more. <br />Councilmember Etten agreed with Mayor Roe that where the Commission goes after April is <br />an important topic. He indicated this would not be a long-term plan, but he wondered where <br />the Council was at for its own next steps. <br />Councilmember Strahan felt like the Council has been asked if it is encouraging this group to <br />continue meeting as an entity since as of April 1, the Commission is no longer in the City Code <br />as one of its groups. <br />Mayor Roe indicated the Commission is still in the City Code and that has not changed. <br />Councilmember Strahan asked if the Commission continues with five members going forward <br />while the Council continues to assess. <br />Councilmember Etten thought that was correct. <br />Mayor Roe concurred and hoped that all of the work done on the workplan so far does not go <br />away. Hopefully, there is a way to not get active in doing a lot of it, necessarily, just if there <br />is a sense that may or may not match with where things have been going in this conversation. <br />Qbhf!93!pg!354 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.