CCP 02242025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, April 8, 2024 Page 2 saw an example of that in their last item. He suggested a group that would not be limited to the SREAP but thinking equity and inclusion more broadly in the functions in the City. He also thought with the hiring of Mr. Montez, the City has the opportunity for some members of the HRIEC to be a part of the hiring process and to think about other ways, as the MAC does with police officers. He asked if there are ways for this group to have a role in that process. The one thing he would push back on, in the review of what came out of the Commission, is the sense that a Commission is what worked best. He thought there were a lot of ideas, up to three different groups. He noted one Commissioner had talked strongly about that as a thing to have a Commission. But, he also thought there was a lot of discussion about two or three groups. For him, it was the purpose that the City needs to come back around, nail that first, and then discussion can be around the process for how the City would get to that purpose. Councilmember Groff indicated he did want to hear what Mr. Montez has to say as well because Mr. Montez has a breadth of experience that the City needs to capitalize on in making this decision. As far the discussions about the committee to be more like MAC or a Commission, one of the reasons he was hearing is because the Commissioners were thinking that an organization like MAC would not follow the same structure as a City Commission. He thought it was important that this Commission does follow the same structure as a City Commission because it needs to be transparent. He indicated he does not like the idea, even though the Commission said it might make people more comfortable having conversations, of this being off the transparent structure for the public. Mayor Roe indicated the Commission definitely had a lot of back and forth in their discussion about the structure of the Commission and a lot of ideas were out there. But, he thought most of the Commissioners agreed with the idea of a structured Commission. He noted this was an evolutionary discussion and he appreciated that is the way it worked. He thought it made sense to have a draft purpose statement if the sub-committee is willing to look at that as something to respond to in the discussion on May 13. He noted it helps to have that guided discussion about drilling down on some of the other points about the roles, how the group would interact with SREAP, and the equity statements in the RCAs. He can envision ways in which that could work well and ways it can’t so he thought that is an appropriate conversation to have at that meeting. Mayor Roe thought it was interesting that the discussion talked about whether the Commission wanted to make sure that it matched what the Council was looking for. He noted there was some pushback on that which was appropriate because he did not think the Council intended for the Commission to read their minds. He appreciated that the Commission thought more from the point of view of what made the most sense. The other piece he thought was interesting was that former Equity and Inclusion Manger, Thomas Brooks had the Commission look and do a sounding board sort of activity related to the original SREAP. This was done when SREAP was first introduced and the Commission was confused as to why they were tasked with doing that because it did not seem to match with their understanding of what the Commission was supposed to be doing. That, to him, was a very insightful thing. There was other related feedback about the tension between what Commissioners thought the Commission was supposed to be doing and what was before them at each meeting for them to discuss. Certainly, that coincides with the sense of tension through the last few years on the Commission. Qbhf!98!pg!354