My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 04212025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 04212025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2025 3:53:20 PM
Creation date
4/25/2025 3:53:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
4/21/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From:Rachel Brown <br />To:Dan Roe <br />Subject:Aldine Street Vacation - <br />Date:Monday, April 21, 2025 10:50:37 AM <br />You don't often get email from brown-rachel@comcast.net. Learn why this is important <br />Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. <br />Hi Mayor Roe, <br />I am one of the 8 underlying property owners of the Aline Street Vacation (Area V) that you <br />will be voting on tonight. <br />I ask you to please vote Yes on the full vacation of the Area V tonight. <br />All 8 property owners are eager to have full access to our land (subject to the utility easement). <br />We also all agree that we do not want a formal, city-code compliant paved path that would <br />completely alter our landscapes, change our use of our properties, disrupt our lives during <br />planning and construction, remove or distress, existing oak trees, and cost the city a lot of time <br />and money. <br />And for me, personally, the full vacation lets me finally address signifiant issues on my <br />property where I have lived for 25 years. <br />1)The ROW line is just a few feet from my garage entry. (First photos below shows the <br />approximate line from two perspectives). The house, built in 1934, well before the 1950’s <br />ROW was enacted, had a small tuck-under garage. A 1960s addition (white siding part) <br />extended the garage a bit, but either way, the ROW was very close to the garage. This means <br />that in order to have car access to the garage, my driveway must be on the ROW land. <br />2)Because of this, I have a gravel driveway that is not code-compliant and is expensive to <br />maintain. (Third photo shows one of the gravel piles, left on the lawn after a season of snow <br />removal.) Full re-graveling costs about $2,000 and needs to be done every 2-3 years. <br />3)The raising of the roof line in the 1960s remodel also created an issue with the back <br />bedroom windows - they were originally windows to the outside; now they open into the <br />garage (fourth photo). This is a problem that I intend to correct with a garage/house remodel. <br />But without the ROW portion returned to me, there is little space for me to build a normal <br />garage. <br />All this to say, I was very thankful to learn of the city’s plan to vacate the ROW for me and <br />the other underlying property owners of this land. <br />My fiancé and I have begun work with an architect on the home and garage design, but we <br />cannot move forward with this until the ROW issue is resolved. <br />So we really hope you will vote yes for the full vacation tonight. <br />Thank you for your consideration. <br />Qbhf!65!pg!216 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.