My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 05052025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 05052025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2025 9:56:41 AM
Creation date
5/13/2025 9:56:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
5/5/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 5/5/2025 <br />Item No.: 7.c. <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br /> <br /> <br />Item Description: Consider Resolution Updating the Special Assessment Deferral <br />Policy <br />1 <br />2 Background <br />3 Minnesota State Statute § 435.193 allows for deferral of special assessments if the City <br />4 adopts an ordinance or resolution establishing standards and guidelines for determining the <br />5 existence of a hardship and for determining the existence of a disability. A deferral does not <br />6 forgive or reduce an assessment, it only delays payment of the assessment. When the <br />7 assessment no longer qualifies for deferral, the property owner will be required to pay all <br />8 principal and interest that has accrued since the levy date. Any remaining assessment <br />9 would be due according to the original terms. <br />10 <br />11 Roseville adopted Resolution No. 7216 for a deferral process in 1981. In 2008, the State <br />12 added military personnel as eligible for the deferrals. Staff discussed an update to the 1981 <br />13 resolution with the PWET Commission at their April meeting (Attachment 5) and would like <br />14 City Council to consider adoption of an update to the policy. The proposed updates to the <br />15 resolution primarily add active military status as eligible and defer to the Social Security <br />16 Administration or a physician to determine “permanent and total disability.” <br />17 <br />18 Policy Objectives <br />19 The City’s financial policies are consistent with governmental finance best practices as well <br />20 as previously adopted Council actions. <br />21 <br />22 Equity Impact Summary <br />23 The City and state statute recognize that special assessments, although they increase the <br />24 value of a property, may cause financial hardship on the property owner. The state statute <br />25 allows for a hardship deferral of assessments based on age, disability, or military status. <br />26 Although any property owner can object or appeal the assessment, the state statute does <br />27 not allow deferral based on income alone, race, gender, etc. The documents needed when <br />28 applying for deferral are likely available to an applicant at no cost; however, applying does <br />29 require fluency in some systems and a time commitment that may not be available to all. <br />30 <br />31 Budget Implications <br />32 Although the City fronts the costs for assessments and waits up to 10 years to be repaid, <br />33 plus interest, the impact of deferring any assessments is minimal and should be offset by <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />Qbhf!53!pg!248 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.