My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 06162025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 06162025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2025 12:28:19 PM
Creation date
7/8/2025 12:27:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
6/16/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
353
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 6/16/2025 <br />Item No.: 7.f. <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br /> <br /> <br />Item Description: Receive Update on Civic Campus Master Plan <br />1 <br />2 Background <br />3 At the March 17, 2025 City Council meeting, the Council approved a Professional Services <br />4 Agreement for Architectural Services with BKV Architects (BKV) to determine if there is a <br />5 less costly option for the License/Passport Center & Dance Studio (LPCDS) than the <br />6 current plan identified in the Civic Campus Pre-Design Study (CCPDS). Major tasks in the <br />7 agreement included the following: <br />8 Provide an updated cost estimate for the proposed LPCDS which is proposed in the <br />9 CCPDS. <br />10 Provide an updated cost estimate for the Maintenance Operations Center (MOC) as <br />11 proposed in the CCPDS. <br />12 Provide a cost estimate for a single story LPCDS instead of the two-story plan. <br />13 Provide feasibility options to reuse portions of the existing Maintenance Facility (MF) <br />14 for LPCDS use. <br />15 Provide feasibility options to reuse portions of the existing Maintenance Facility for <br />16 other uses such as office space, restaurant, or event venue use. <br />17 Provide report and presentation to Council. <br />18 Provide facility assessment of existing Maintenance Facility buildings. <br />19 Scope Verification: Staff worked with BKV and their sub-consultants to review program <br />20 usage, conduct a facility assessment and look at options identified in the scope as well as a <br />21 few additional options. The only change to program usage was the LPC whose needs <br />22 increased from 8,700 GSF to 10,400 GSF due to growth in LPC operations since 2021. <br />23 This increased scope increases costs for this facility in the proposed new estimates and <br />24 alternatives. <br />25 <br />26 Facility Assessment: The facility assessment rating conducted indicated that the 2003 <br />27 garage is in fair condition and could be feasible for reuse or to remodel. The north and east <br />28 garages are in fair to poor conditions and would be less cost-effective to re-use or remodel. <br />29 The report indicates that if all three buildings continue to be used “as is,” more than $3.7 <br />30 million in improvements would be needed over the next 10 years. <br />31 <br />32 Updated Costs & Concepts: The consultant provided updated cost estimates of the <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />Qbhf!2:9!pg!464 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.