My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
25_0422_PWETC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2025
>
25_0422_PWETC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2025 12:28:44 PM
Creation date
10/1/2025 12:27:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/22/2025
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
123 Ms. Lowry discussed the comprehensive nature of the active transportation plan, <br />124 including engineering, enforcement, and education elements. She noted the draft <br />125 plan included recommendations for potential funding sources and toward zero <br />126 deaths vision policies, with room for education and engagement elements. <br />127 <br />128 Chair Ficek explained that he appreciated the committee's involvement and that it <br />129 started a great conversation with stakeholders. He inquired about a timeline for <br />130 reviewing the final report and ensuring the plan was not left on a shelf. <br />131 <br />132 Mr. Freihammer explained that the pathway master plan was funded for the next <br />133 year and suggested that it be refreshed every three to four years. <br />134 <br />135 Chair Ficek agreed not to let the plan sit for ten years. <br />136 <br />137 Ms. Lowry highlighted the plan's potential for funding applications and creating a <br />138 CIP line item for new pathways. <br />139 <br />140 Chair Ficek asked about public involvement and the plan's release for public <br />141 comment. <br />142 <br />143 Ms. Lowry explained the process of incorporating committee comments and <br />144 targeting public engagement. <br />145 <br />146 Ms. Lowry discussed the plan's public engagement strategy, including targeted <br />147 community conversations and a one -page summary. She explained the need for pre- <br />148 installation counts and measures of success. <br />149 <br />150 Chair Ficek asked about the plan's integration with county projects. <br />151 <br />152 Ms. Lowry explained the county's involvement and the iterative process. <br />153 <br />154 Mr. Freihammer mentioned ongoing county projects and the supportive <br />155 relationship with the county. <br />156 <br />157 Chair Ficek raised concerns about summer maintenance and the cleanliness of bike <br />158 paths, suggesting targeted education tools. He shared examples from Ames, Iowa, <br />159 of a comprehensive safety tool for different modes of transportation. <br />160 <br />161 Ms. Lowry mentioned the state's new requirement for biking and walking safety <br />162 classes and the development of materials by a consultant. She noted that MnDOT <br />163 hosted the current bike plan website and would be transitioned to the city's site. <br />164 <br />165 8. Election of Officers <br />166 <br />167 Public Works Director Freihammer announced the need to re-elect officers per City <br />168 Code, starting with the chair. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Page 6 of 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.