Laserfiche WebLink
As part of the tree inventory, staff identified several considerations regarding tree preservation at <br />the site: <br /> Key concern: large oak trees, with current conditions mixed and in some cases unknown. <br /> Risks: potential damage from soil compaction, grading, and heavy traffic. <br />A traditional trail design would likely result in significant tree loss. <br /> A non-traditional approach could reduce overall impacts. <br />Possible next step: engage an arborist and engineer to determine the potential best trail <br />route and ways to mitigate tree loss. <br /> <br />The Commission reviewed the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan guidance for pedestrian <br />community connections, focusing on Goals 4.1, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6. Staff noted that the Master Plan <br />identified this right-of-way segment as a potential “constellation link,” a conceptual connector <br />intended to support system-wide recreation access. However, this segment was not identified as a <br />priority route in the City’s Pathway Master Plan, which serves as the guide for future pathway <br />projects. <br /> <br />Staff reviewed metrics related to park access impacts for the right-of-way: <br /> The ROW is located within Constellation K. <br /> Closest Park: Evergreen Park (Community Park). <br />o Distance via ROW: 0.51 miles. <br />o Distance via streets: 0.69 miles. <br /> The Mid Oaks neighborhood falls outside the Trust for Public Land (TPL) 10-minute <br />walk-to-a-park radius goal. Currently, 94% of Roseville residents fall within the TPL 10- <br />minute walk-to-a-park standard. <br />o Evergreen Park (via Fairview): 0.86 miles. <br />o Falcon Heights Community Park: 0.86 miles. <br />o Evergreen Park (via ROW): 0.68 miles. <br /> The Commission reviewed existing pedestrian connections near the ROW <br />Staff reviewed potential cost considerations for the right-of-way: <br /> Hardscape path: $84,000–$177,000. <br /> Non-concrete path: $20,000–$60,000 (including design and site work). <br /> Volunteers and staff could assist with clearing invasive species and creating informal <br />paths. <br /> Engineering work would still be required to address slopes and accessibility. <br /> <br />The Commission revisited several questions that had been discussed at the previous meeting: <br /> Other neighborhood connections were created during the platting process. <br /> The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) can make a recommendation without the <br />ROW becoming a park. <br /> The PRC may provide advice on community engagement and implementation. <br /> Flooding risk is considered minimal with appropriate mitigation. <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />