My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 09152025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 09152025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2025 2:48:55 PM
Creation date
10/21/2025 2:48:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
9/15/2025
Meeting Type
Work Session
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 3 <br />211 prevent tree loss if roots are disturbed. Ms. Quinn also referenced recent City Communications <br />212 celebrating an award for natural resources management, which highlighted the importance of <br />213 preservation. <br />214 <br />215 She urged the Commission to prioritize saving both the mature trees and the privacy of the <br />216 abutting neighbors, who did not expect or want to live next to a park. <br />217 <br />218 O.Gault,2021 Herschel St. <br />219 O.Gault, 2021 Herschel Street, spoke in favor of retaining the path. She noted that she walks the <br />220 path year-round and, although it has never been shoveled, neighbors continue to use it in the <br />221 winter. She emphasized that residents are not asking for anything new but simply want to <br />222 continue using the existing walking path, which she has relied on for the 30 years she has lived <br />223 in the neighborhood. <br />224 <br />225 Ms. Gault explained that she was unaware until the initial vacate notice that some abutting <br />226 property owners did not want people walking on the ROW. In response to the closing of the path <br />227 she created an on-line petition, and within one week it received 98 signatures representing 68 <br />228 households, all supporting the continuation of the path. <br />229 <br />230 She expressed regret that the issue has become divisive between abutting homeowners and the <br />231 rest of the neighborhood. However, she emphasized her hope that both the path and the <br />232 greenspace can be preserved. <br />233 <br />234 D.Urswell,1731 Shryer <br />235 D.Urswell, 1731 Shryer Avenue, spoke in favor of preserving the path. She expressed concern <br />236 for children living on Mid Oaks, noting that without the path they cannot move between <br />237 neighborhoods without running across busy streets. She emphasized that the path has served as a <br />238 well-established neighborhood connection for more than 30 years and that it is unfair to isolate <br />239 children by removing it. <br />240 <br />241 Ms. Urswell stated that children should have the opportunity to take the healthier route of <br />242 walking along the path, rather than being forced to rely on motor vehicles to travel between <br />243 neighborhoods or access local community amenities. <br />244 <br />245 J.Pribyl, 1738 Skillman Ave. <br />246 J.Pribyl, 1738 Skillman Avenue, spoke in support of the path. He stated that he enjoys using the <br />247 path and appreciates that this unique situation is being given thoughtful and creative <br />248 consideration. He noted that the path serves as a connector between neighborhoods as well as to <br />249 the University of Minnesota agricultural fields, which welcome walkers and provides a large <br />250 open space for recreation that his family takes advantage of often. <br />251 <br />252 Mr. Pribyl also highlighted the importance of the trees, noting that they have long existed <br />253 alongside and within the ROW. He expressed appreciation that everyone’s input is being <br />254 considered and that the process has allowed neighbors to hear and understand each other’s <br />255 perspectives. <br />256 <br />6 <br />Qbhf!32!pg!354 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.