My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 10132025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 10132025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2025 4:14:47 PM
Creation date
10/21/2025 4:10:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
10/13/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
904
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MN <br />State: <br />55113 <br />Zip: <br />This form goes to the Mayor, all Councilmembers and certain City Staff. Due to <br />the volume of emails submitted, a personal reply is not always possible. <br />No Reply Necessary <br />How would you prefer <br />to be contacted? <br />Remember to fill in the <br />corresponding contact <br />information. <br />Email Address: <br />Field not completed. <br />Phone Number: <br />The leaf deposit site off Dale needs to stay - it is a place many <br />Please Share Your <br />residents have and will continue to rely on when it comes to fall <br />Comment, Question or <br />and spring cleanups. It is crucial for Roseville residents, like <br />Concern <br />myself, who cannot afford leaf pickup/ paid lawn care or afford to <br />add a compost bin to my already expensive trash bill. I also add <br />that it needs to stay for the environment in Roseville. <br />Please keep it as is. Thank you for your time and consideration. <br />Unless restricted by law, all correspondence to and from Roseville City <br />government offices, including information submitted through electronic forms such <br />as this one, may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act <br />and/or may be disclosed to third parties. Due to Minnesota Open Meetings Law, <br />Councilmembers are not allowed to use the "reply-all" function if it includes other <br />Councilmembers for their response back to the emailer. Any response back to <br />the sender will be just to that individual and will not include other <br />Councilmembers. <br />Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. <br />Qbhf!251!pg!:15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.