CCP 10132025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

46 Interviews were conducted by the review committee on Wednesday October 1, 2025. Each 47 of the firms provided a brief presentation and were interviewed by staff to clarify questions 48 about the proposals. Based on the interviews and the proposals, the top scoring firm that 49 staff recommends for selection is Kraus-Anderson. 50 51 Their proposal documents that they have completed over 2,200 CmaR projects which 52 include over 40 public works projects similar to the Roseville project. Recent projects 53 include Cottage Grove Public Works, Rosemount Public Works and Police, Fairmount 54 Public Work Facility, and City of Oakdale Public Works. They also have experience with 55 license/passport centers and dance studios and have done over 20 similar projects. 56 Examples include the Washington County License Center, Monticello DMV Relocation, 57 Rochester North Service Center, Education Center and Chanhassen License 58 Center. 59 60 The overall project team has extensive experience which was a clear step above the next 61 highest scoring firm. The project manager and the site superintendent who will be 62 assigned to this project both have over 10 years of experience and have done projects of 63 similar size and scope. 64 65 Kraus-Anderson’s existing knowledge of the site, having been part of two architectural 66 studies including performing a facility condition assessment of the Maintenance Facility, is 67 a clear benefit to the project. They are familiar with construction issues that will be 68 challenging to keep the project moving forward on budget and on schedule. They 69 understand they need to keep City operations, including Parks and Recreation, Public 70 Works as well as PoliceF fire, License/Passport Center and the VFW, in operation during 71 construction. 72 73 The cost of services and hours provided for the scope of work were about average for all 74 the firms that submitted. With the overall project team experience and familiarity with the 75 project overall, staff believes the cost of services is fair and the overall best value on the 76 project. 77 78 The Civic Campus project is very challenging in that it is a phased project, includes re- 79 using portions of one building, has a very small site for construction, and city/private 80 operations need to always be ongoing throughout construction. The experience Kraus- 81 Anderson provides will be valuable to mitigate these risks. The estimated overall 82 construction budget is $59,000,000. Change orders of only 1% would equate to $590,000 83 so hiring a firm that can best anticipate, manage, and mitigate risk ahead of time will be 84 crucial to effectively managing the project budget. 85 86 The Kraus-Anderson team also includes Eden Resources, which will help with public 87 relations and community engagement. This is very key with this project as construction is 88 adjacent to residential properties, the VFW, the Oval/Skating Center, and Veterans Park. 89 The project will span three years of construction and be done in numerous phases so the 90 public using the facilities will need information on changing conditions. The Kraus-Anderson 91 proposal best understood the high need to engage/communicate with the public throughout 92 the project, which is an extremely important value of the City. 93 94 Below is the summary of the scoring of the RFP criteria (firms that were not interviewed Page 3 of 5 Qbhf!28:!pg!:15