Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Attachment 5 <br />I would like an implementation process to engage the neighborhood and work toward a <br />solution that could be positive for everyone. <br />Could Park Dedication funds be considered to fund implementation (in full or in part)? <br />What is this path going to look like? <br />Does it make sense to have a 30-foot-wide park in Roseville? <br />It may not be part of the Commission’s initial recommendation to answer each of these <br />questions, but to determine if this is an alternative worth pursuing and pursue the other <br />questions further down the line. <br />Site Analysis <br />There are a total of 57 inventoried trees (some with multiple tributary branches) on the site with <br />a diameter of at least three inches, 24 of which have a diameter of at least 10 inches. The <br />trees run the spectrum of condition, with some showing signs of decline while others appear to <br />be thriving. <br />The value of the trees varies based on species quality, size, and condition, but most of the <br />trees generally appear to be in good health. Eight trees are invasive, or green ash, and would <br />typically be removed to align with the City’s Natural Resources Management Plan. Removal of <br />those trees would cost an estimated $3,000 - $5,000 and could be funded from the forestry <br />budget. <br />The majority of ground cover vegetation is either buckthorn or other woody invasive species. <br />The City’s practice within right of way is typically not to provide natural resource maintenance. <br />In parks, the City would typically remove these invasives and replace them with native species. <br />This could largely be accomplished utilizing an initial intervention with a contractor (Stantec), <br />followed by subsequent work from volunteer natural resources stewards. <br />There are significant encroachments into the right of way on both the south and north side of <br />the parcel, which makes the parcel feel less accessible than it would if there was a full thirty <br />foot right of way. On the north side, the flattest (and most accessible) portion of the right of way <br />is located within the fence that encroaches on it. On the south side, a fence and plantings <br />requires pedestrians to leave the right of way to continue through to Roselawn St. <br />By preliminary analysis, it appears that there are potential routes where an informal trail could <br />run through the right of way without extreme tree impact or grade changes. <br />Tree Preservation <br />One of the core conversation points has been tree preservation. As has been mentioned, there <br />are a number of significant and valuable trees on the site. Most significantly, there are seven <br />oak trees on the south side with a diameter breast height (DBH) of greater than 20 inches. <br />According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Compaction within the trees <br />’ <br />root zone adversely impacts the tree. Compaction can result from machinery/vehicular traffic, <br /> foot traffic, and from stockpiling materials over a trees root zone. Grading within the trees root <br />’’ <br />zone, whether cutting or filling, also negatively impacts trees. Given this guidance, the best <br />practice would be to avoid significant grade changes, and vehicle traffic within a dripline of <br />such significant trees. It is important to note that a feasibility memo prepared by the Public <br />Works department stated that a traditional bituminous path would result in significant tree loss <br />Qbhf!41!pg!29: <br /> <br />