My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-09-30 PWETC Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2025
>
2025-09-30 PWETC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2025 12:50:47 PM
Creation date
11/21/2025 12:50:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/30/2025
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Amy Schroeder emphasized that the site is more than just a convenience; <br />it is a highly valued service and a vital part of Roseville's environmental and <br />public works infrastructure. She believes that if this site closes, there will be an <br />increase in illegal dumping. This would pose a significant burden for the City <br />and its staff to manage. <br />Several residents expressed concerns about the closure, emphasizing the site's <br />convenience and accessibility. They suggested alternatives, such as a vacuum <br />shredding program and contractor vacuuming. The importance of the site for <br />seniors and the potential rise in illegal dumping were also highlighted. <br />Residents were urged to keep the site open and explore a volunteer -based <br />solution. <br />Commission members inquired about the vacuum program, expenses for new <br />equipment, and the option of leasing. They also discussed relocating the <br />organics collection site to a more convenient location. The potential impact of <br />the closure on the City's sustainability goals and the community's <br />environmental practices was considered. The idea of exploring a cost -sharing <br />agreement with Ramsey County was raised. <br />Commission members discussed the feasibility of volunteer -based solutions <br />and the challenges of managing the site. The potential for a county -managed <br />site and its impact on the City's budget were considered. The importance of <br />maintaining the site's current services and the potential for increased costs at <br />other locations was highlighted. <br />The commission members expressed their support for explaining alternative <br />solutions and ensuring the site's continued accessibility. <br />Member Brokaw Palalay expressed shock at having to figure out yard waste <br />removal in Roseville, contrasting it with Minneapolis, where it was centralized. <br />She mentioned the need to bag yard waste and the inconvenience of not having <br />a centralized system. She shared her personal experience of taking yard waste <br />to Arden Hills to dispose of everything at once. She highlighted her preference <br />for a clean yard and her reluctance to compost, despite others finding it <br />appealing. <br />Member Mueller proposed considering used equipment as a cost -saving option. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained the challenges of acquiring used equipment, <br />including the need for inspections and transportation. He stated that the cost of <br />a new machine is high compared to its usage, and noted leasing could be a more <br />cost-effective option. He also discussed the logistics of moving equipment and <br />the limitations of their current setup. <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.