My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 12082025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 12082025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2025 2:27:14 PM
Creation date
12/9/2025 2:26:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
12/8/2025
Meeting Type
Special
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
149(homestead and non-homestead, apartments) taxpayers comprise 64% of the taxpayers and pay 62% of <br />150 total property taxes with the remaining classifications comprising 36% of taxpayers and paying 38% of <br />151 the total property taxes. <br />152 <br />153 Although residential customers comprise the vast majority of utility users in Roseville, they will contribute <br />154 a smaller share of total franchise fee revenue compared to their share of city property tax payments as <br />155 shown in the table. <br />156 <br />Electric and Gas Percentage of <br />Utility Customers Franchise Fees <br />(Roseville)Paid <br />Residential88%40% <br />Non-Residential12%60% <br />Source: Xcel Energy Source: Xcel <br />CompanyEnergy Company <br />Roseville Taxpayer Percentage of <br />CompositionProperty Tax <br />Paid <br />Residential57%54% <br />Non-Residential43%46% <br />Source: Ramsey Source: MN <br />County Assessor Department of <br />OfficeRevenue <br />State of Percentages of <br />Minnesota Taxpayer Property Tax <br />CompositionPaid <br />Residential64%62% <br />Non-Residential36%38% <br />Source: MN House Source: MN <br />ResearchHouse Research <br />157 <br />158 <br />159 <br />160 Additional Levy Scenarios <br />161 With the receipt and acceptance of the SAFER and COPS grant, the City Council and staff reviewed <br />162 three levy scenarios centered around the use of the franchise fees. Below is a summary of each levy <br />163 scenario. Additional information about the scenarios is contained in Attachment X. <br />164 <br />165 Scenario 1 <br />166 Adds the public safety personnel with the SAFER and COPS grants partially assisting in the <br />167 costs for 2026 <br />168 Firefighters starting on April 15, 2026 <br />169 No franchise fees are implemented <br />170 No additional capital spending is proposed <br />171 Scenario 1 results in a tax levy increase of 11.54% and an increase of $15.71 more per month for the <br />172 owner of the median-valued home ($378,600) <br />173 <br />174 Scenario 2 <br />175 Adds the public safety personnel with the SAFER and COPS grants partially assisting in the <br />176 costs for 2026 <br />177 Firefighters starting on April 15, 2026 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />Qbhf!:!pg!472 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.