My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01052026
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2026
>
CCP 01052026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 1:46:38 PM
Creation date
1/6/2026 1:46:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/5/2026
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 2 <br />March 31, 2025 <br />Representative David Gottfried <br />th <br />5 Floor Centennial Office Building <br />St. Paul, MN 55155 <br />RE: City comments on HF 1987/SF 2229 (“Minnesota Starter Home Act”), HF 2140/SF <br />2231 (“More Homes Right Places Act”) and HF 2018/SF 2286 (“Transforming Main <br />Street Act”) <br />Dear Representative Gottfried: <br />I am writing this letter to express our concern with multiple pieces of legislation known as the <br />Minnesota Starter Home Act, More Homes Right Places Act and Transforming Main Street Act. <br />At our March 24, 2025 City Council meeting, my colleagues and I revisited our previous letter <br />from April 15, 2024 regarding legislation that was known as the Missing Middle Housing bill and <br />collectively find similar concerns with the bills being considered this session. I submit this letter <br />to reaffirm our continued concern with the breadth of the proposed changes these bills will have <br />in our community, the unforeseen outcomes for local governments that could occur if this <br />legislation is adopted, and the level of specificity to which local control is being preempted by <br />these bills. Further, none of these bills guarantee more affordable housing or increased <br />development by itself. <br />As we communicated a year ago, Roseville understands the housing shortage that faces our State <br />and has put considerable efforts, both regulatorily and financially, towards efforts to address <br />housing needs within our City. We are concerned that if these bills pass, they will have unintended <br />consequences on the otherwise thoughtful efforts Roseville has deployed locally, which are based <br />on analysis of local needs and after engagement with community members. <br />oseville has worked very hard in recent years to create more affordable housing and missing <br />R <br />middle housing. A few examples include: <br />Approval of nearly 700 units of affordable apartments over the last several years, <br />Approval of amendments to our Zoning Code to allow two-unit housing types (or missing <br />middle housing) in zoning districts that previously only permitted single family homes, <br />Permitting Accessory Dwelling Units for more than ten years, and <br />Maintaining a Land Trust Partnership program with Habitat for Humanity that has resulted <br />in existing single-family homes being sold with covenants that ensure long-term <br />affordability for families earning 80% of the Area Median Income. <br />The above efforts resulted in considerable financial commitment from the City, engagement with <br />our community, and implementation of our Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan. If the current <br />bills pass, our thoughtful approach to meeting our community’s housing needs will be threatened <br />and instead, the developer will solely get to determine what gets built and where. Roseville is not <br />opposed to State intervention on a broader scale, but we do object to the rigid approach, <br />prescriptive mandates and lack of flexibility of these bills. <br />2660 Civic Center Drive • Roseville, MN 55113 <br />www.cityofroseville.com <br />Qbhf!51!pg!2:6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.